e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
| |
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
July 31,
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number: 001-33347
Aruba Networks, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
| |
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
02-0579097
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
1344 Crossman Ave.
Sunnyvale, California
94089-1113
(408) 227-4500
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number,
including area code, of
registrants principal executive offices)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
| |
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(NASDAQ Global Select Market)
|
Securities
registered pursuant to 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
| Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Act.) Yes
o No þ
As of January 31, 2011, the last business day of the
registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter,
the aggregate market value of the registrants common stock
held by non-affiliates was approximately $2,063,670,475, based
on the closing price of such stock reported for such date on the
NASDAQ Global Select Market. This calculation does not reflect a
determination that persons are affiliates for any other purposes.
The number of outstanding shares of the registrants common
stock was 105,678,491 as of September 14, 2011.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants Proxy Statement for the 2011
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of
the registrants fiscal year ended July 31, 2011 are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
In addition to historical information, this report contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You can
identify these forward-looking statements by words such as
anticipate, believe,
continue, could, estimate,
expect, intend, may,
plan, predict, potential,
should, will, would and
other similar expressions. These statements include, among other
things, statements concerning our expectations:
|
|
|
| |
|
that revenues from our indirect channels will continue to
constitute a significant majority of our future revenues;
|
| |
| |
|
that competition will intensify in the future as other
companies introduce new products in the same markets we serve or
intend to enter;
|
| |
| |
|
that our product offerings, in particular our products that
incorporate 802.11n wireless local area network
(LAN) standard technologies, will enable broader
networking initiatives by both our current and potential
customers;
|
| |
| |
|
regarding the factors that will affect our gross margins;
|
| |
| |
|
regarding the growth of our offshore operations and the
establishment of additional offshore capabilities for certain
general and administrative functions;
|
| |
| |
|
that, within our indirect channel, sales through our
value-added distributors (VADs) and original
equipment manufacturers (OEMs) will continue to be
significant, which will negatively impact our gross margins as
VADs and OEMs experience a larger net effective discount than
our other channel partners;
|
| |
| |
|
that international revenues will increase in absolute dollars
and remain consistent or increase as a percentage of total
revenues in future periods compared with fiscal 2011;
|
| |
| |
|
that we will continue to hire employees;
|
| |
| |
|
that we will continue to invest significantly in our research
and development efforts;
|
| |
| |
|
that research and development expenses for fiscal 2012 will
increase on an absolute dollar basis and decrease as a
percentage of revenue compared with fiscal 2011;
|
| |
| |
|
regarding continued momentum in our network rightsizing and
MOVE architecture initiatives;
|
| |
| |
|
that we will continue to invest strategically in our sales
and marketing efforts;
|
| |
| |
|
that sales and marketing expenses for fiscal 2012 will
continue to be our most significant operating expense and will
increase on an absolute dollar basis and decrease as a
percentage of revenue compared with fiscal 2011;
|
| |
| |
|
that general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2012 will
increase on an absolute dollar basis and decrease as a
percentage of revenue compared with fiscal 2011;
|
| |
| |
|
that ratable product and related professional services and
support revenues will decrease in absolute dollars and as a
percentage of total revenues in future periods;
|
| |
| |
|
that, as we expand internationally, we may incur additional
costs to conform our products to comply with local laws and
product specifications, and we plan to continue to hire
additional personnel to support our growing international
customer base;
|
| |
| |
|
regarding the sufficiency of our existing cash, cash
equivalents, short-term investments and cash generated from
operations, and
|
| |
| |
|
that we will increase our market penetration and extend our
geographic reach through our network of channel partners,
|
as well as other statements regarding our future operations,
financial condition and prospects and business strategies. These
forward-looking statements are based on information available to
us as of the date of this report and current expectations,
forecasts and assumptions are subject to certain risks and
uncertainties that could cause
3
our actual results to differ materially from those reflected
in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or
contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to,
those discussed in this report, and in particular, the risks
discussed under the heading Risk Factors in
Part I, Item 1A of this report and those discussed in
other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). Our forward-looking statements
should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any
subsequent date, and we are under no obligation to, and
expressly disclaim any responsibility to, update or alter our
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise. Given these risks and
uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance
on such forward-looking statements.
The following information should be read in conjunction with
the Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report.
Overview
Aruba Networks is a leading provider of next-generation network
access solutions for the mobile enterprise. Our product
portfolio encompasses industry-leading high-speed 802.11n
wireless local area networks (WLANs), Virtual
Branching Networking solutions for branch offices and
teleworkers, network operations tools, including spectrum
analyzers, wireless intrusion prevention systems, and the
AirWave Wireless Management Suite for managing wired, wireless,
and mobile device networks. During the third quarter of fiscal
2011, we introduced our new Mobile Virtual Enterprise
(MOVE) architecture. Our MOVE architecture unifies
wired and wireless network infrastructures into one seamless
access solution for corporate headquarters, mobile business
professionals, remote workers and guests. This unified approach
to access networks dramatically improves productivity and lowers
capital and operational costs compared to wired networks.
Our products have been sold to over 15,500 end customers
worldwide (not including customers of Alcatel-Lucent), including
some of the largest and most complex global organizations. We
have implemented a two-tier distribution model in most areas of
the world, including the United States (U.S.), with
VADs selling our portfolio of products, including a variety of
our support services, to a diverse number of value-added
resellers (VARs). Our focus continues to be
management of our channel, including selection and growth of
high prospect partners, activation of our VARs and VADs through
active training and field collaboration, and evolution of our
channel programs in consultation with our partners.
Industry
Background
Network users are increasingly mobile and depend on continuous
access to enterprise networks in order to work productively in
the office, at home, or on the road. No longer just a
convenience, mobile computing and connectivity are business
critical infrastructure that must deliver to mobile users the
same experience, access to data, and security as they would
enjoy at the office.
Most critically, businesses of all types are being overrun by
employee-owned mobile devices on the network, and many are
seeking to deploy these devices en masse as well. Most current
deployed networks are designed for a port-based architecture,
with mobility as an added convenience and
best-effort solution.
Our vision is to transform the way that organizations design,
deploy, manage and maintain user access networks to deliver a
wide range of applications, from data to voice and video, to
users wherever and whenever they want. This strategy is
delivered via our MOVE architecture.
Our MOVE architecture is unique in that it is context-aware,
taking user, device, location and application into account when
applying security and management policies over the network.
Context-awareness also helps ensure application performance and
network reliability. This enables customer organizations to
rightsize their networks, reducing the number of physical ports.
It also helps ensure secure connectivity for tablets and
smartphones. This
4
enables access networks to be built at a fraction of the cost of
traditionally overprovisioned and undersubscribed
ethernet-switch based access networks, while providing greater
utility, utilization, security and visibility.
Effectively implemented, secure mobility solutions offer a
significant competitive advantage by allowing resources to be
used optimally and at the lowest cost. We expect that ultimately
every workplace will be all-wireless, and users will be
completely un-tethered from restrictive wired networks.
Delivering secure mobility solutions requires that certain
challenges be overcome:
|
|
|
| |
|
Enabling both security and mobility
Radio waves cannot be confined within a buildings walls,
challenging traditional wired network physical security models
that depend on an impenetrable perimeter. To enable mobility,
network access privileges and permissions must be clearly
defined on a per-user basis to enable secure access and the
reliable delivery of data, voice, video, and other applications
to mobile users. Unauthorized wireless devices that could
potentially circumvent network security must be detected and
prevented.
|
| |
| |
|
Delivering applications reliably in a mobile
environment Without special handling, many
applications that are intended to be delivered over a fixed
network may perform
sub-optimally
in a mobile environment. This is especially true for
mission-critical data and latency-sensitive voice and video
applications. Enabling a network to recognize and adapt to an
application so-called application
awareness is essential if data, voice and
video are to be delivered reliably and with full fidelity.
|
| |
| |
|
System integration Enterprise-class
mobility solutions require more than just wireless access.
Security, application, network, and radio frequency
(RF) management services are also necessary,
potentially increasing the complexity of a system as it grows in
size and scope. To be effective, a mobility solution must
minimize deployment and integration complexity, and support
massive scalability, without requiring expensive upgrades to
existing networking infrastructure.
|
| |
| |
|
Network and operations management The
management system is the heart of any secure mobility solution
because it so profoundly affects up-time,
ease-of-use,
information technology (IT) overhead, and on-going
operating costs. Essential tasks like network
set-up,
diagnostics, report generation, maintenance, and software
upgrades require an efficient centralized management system that
encompasses wired, wireless, and mobile device networks. To ease
the transition from legacy to new 802.11n
Wi-Fi
networks and make the most of existing capital
investments it is imperative that the management
system seamlessly integrate devices from multiple vendors into a
single management console.
|
| |
| |
|
Support for emerging mobile
applications Secure mobility solutions need
to be future-proof, ready to support emerging applications such
as high definition video, unified communications, real-time
telemetry, wide-area smart grid over resilient mesh, large-scale
telework, and location-based services such as asset tracking and
inventory management.
|
Our
Solution
We believe that our user-centric networks are fundamentally
different from alternative mobility solutions. In traditional
enterprise networks, users are connected to physical ports using
wire cables. These port-centric architectures assume a
static relationship between a user and a data port, and the
network access policies and application delivery priorities are
not designed to accommodate and therefore
limit user mobility away from that port. To enable
user mobility, the fixed ports must either be opened so any user
can connect from any port, or they must be connected to wireless
LANs. Both of these options reduce network security and
application performance in a port-centric architecture. To allow
remote users to securely access a port-centric network,
enterprises commonly deploy virtual private networks
(VPNs), which increase cost and complexity while
often degrading the user experience and application performance.
None of these alternatives address the fundamental challenge of
convenient and secure user access, reliable application
delivery, or delivery of a consistent user experience across
both wireless and wired networks at local and remote locations.
We address the secure mobility problem using a
user-centric architecture that assigns network access
policies to users instead of to data ports or other
infrastructure. As soon as a user is authenticated by our policy
enforcement
5
firewall, access policies are immediately enforced for that
individual, regardless of whether they are working in the
office, from home, or on the road. Our security mechanisms
allows unrestricted mobility and a common user experience
whenever and wherever the network is accessed.
While this design puts wireless networking on an equal footing
with wired networks with respect to security, it also enhances
mobility and potentially increases user productivity and
operational efficiencies. Within a campus environment these
benefits are typically realized by customers who
rightsize their networking infrastructure by
deploying Wi-Fi wherever it is possible to do so, and wired
ethernet only where there is no wireless alternative. For users
at branch offices or on the road, user-centric technology
extends the enterprise network wherever it is needed. Leveraging
this capability, our Virtual Branch Networking solution delivers
an
in-the-office
experience to fixed teleworker and branch office users across
town and around the world.
Other key elements of our user-centric architecture include:
|
|
|
| |
|
Adaptive wireless Adaptive 802.11n
wireless LANs enhance productivity and collaboration by
delivering high performance wireless data, voice, and video
connections even in environments with densely deployed clients
and high levels of RF interference. Our solutions scale for
campus applications yet remain cost-effective for small branch
deployments. They can be used both indoors and outdoors, and
incorporate secure enterprise mesh for completely wireless
networking.
|
| |
| |
|
Identity-based security IT departments can
deliver authentication, encryption, and access control services
to all users via a single integrated, low-power appliance. VPN
termination appliances and access control firewalls are not
required, reducing IT overhead and expenses.
|
| |
| |
|
Application-awareness Our user-centric
network is application-aware it knows what type of
applications are running on the network and will
dynamically adjust itself to improve the performance of data,
voice, and video applications. IT managers can define policies
that prioritize and optimize services based on the specific user
and/or the
application being delivered.
|
| |
| |
|
Vendor-agnostic operations management Our
AirWave Wireless Management Suite is a multi-vendor network
management platform that provides business-critical insights
into the operation of wireless networks made by a wide variety
of different vendors. Whether managing a single vendor network,
or a multi-vendor legacy system in transition to 802.11n, the
AirWave platform extends the life of existing infrastructure
investments and lowers IT overhead associated with managing a
dynamic network.
|
| |
| |
|
Easy to deploy, easy to use We have designed
our architecture as a non-disruptive overlay to existing
enterprise networks, allowing our networks to be quickly
deployed without replacing existing infrastructure.
Additionally, we have integrated all of the disparate elements
of enterprise mobility security, application,
network and RF management services into a single
architecture, making it easier and less expensive to deploy.
|
| |
| |
|
Cost-effective scalability We believe our
architecture provides industry-leading scalability through its
ability to support significant numbers of concurrent users from
a single centralized point of control. In addition, our
integrated solution reduces the amount and type of equipment
required to enable mobility within a given location. As a
result, our architecture enhances management efficiency and
reduces equipment and personnel costs, allowing enterprise IT
managers to scale enterprise mobility solutions in a
cost-effective manner.
|
| |
| |
|
Flexible platform supports emerging
applications By combining the flexibility of
modular software with high-performance, programmable hardware,
customers can rapidly implement updates, upgrades, and new
features with no or minimal equipment changes.
|
| |
| |
|
Remote networking Virtual Branch Networking
extends the benefits of centralized management and secure
networking to branch offices, teleworkers, and road warriors.
Simple to deploy, use and maintain and with the
option to use 3G cellular broadband connections
these remote networking solutions extend the enterprise network
virtually anywhere.
|
6
|
|
|
| |
|
Network rightsizing Network rightsizing
enables customers to lower operating expenses and reduce their
carbon footprint by bringing their wired and wireless LAN
infrastructure in line with actual user demand. Rightsizing is a
three-step process that involves assessing wired ethernet LAN
utilization, consolidating edge switches to meet actual usage,
and expanding the wireless LAN to meet growing demand. We
believe that cost savings can result from, among other things,
fewer switch service contracts, lower electricity consumption,
and reduced air conditioning loading. Our
Return-On-Investment
calculators help predict the monetary and carbon savings
opportunities based on company size and network configuration.
|
Our
Strategy
Our goal is to establish our secure mobility solution as the de
facto standard for global education, enterprise, finance,
government, healthcare, hospitality, industrial, and retail
verticals. In pursuit of this quest, we believe that the
following key elements of our strategy will help us maintain our
competitive advantage:
|
|
|
| |
|
Commitment to customer service and success
Our philosophy is that our customers come first and last in
everything we do. Our commitment to customer success means that
we work collaboratively to do what is best for them and that we
work to see things from their points of view when making our
business and technology decisions. We strive to ensure that our
customer service is the best in the industry. We are
continuously focused on finding new ways to solve our
customers most critical problems, meaning that we listen
closely to their needs and that we seek what is best for them
first, in every instance.
|
| |
| |
|
Enable the proliferation of bring-your-own-device
(BYOD) policies and initiatives across the
enterprise IT departments are at a crossroads.
Whether overwhelmed by the number and variety of wireless
devices that their employees are bringing into the workplace or
embracing and issuing such devices to their employees, chances
are their access networks are ill-designed for the purpose. Our
MOVE architecture and its Mobile Device Access Control
(MDAC) capabilities make broad deployment and secure
self-provisioning of mobile devices possible in either case.
This means that companies can benefit from letting their
employees use the devices they enjoy using without imposing a
heavy support burden on IT.
|
| |
| |
|
Enable the unified communication (UC)
migration More and more enterprises are moving
from wired internet protocol (IP) phones or even
time-division multiplexing (TDM)-based telephony to
unified communications suites such as Microsoft Lync. Less
challenging in a wired networking environment, moving to UC
delivered over Wi-Fi often results in performance degradation
and noticeable loss of quality due to the competition from an
ever-increasing number of Wi-Fi devices for finite wireless
bandwidth. We have worked closely with leading UC vendors such
as Microsoft to ensure that UC runs just as well over
Wi-Fi as it
does over wire.
|
| |
| |
|
Drive adoption across the enterprise Many
enterprises initially deploy our solutions at corporate
headquarters or main campus locations. Our objective is to
penetrate remote locations and gain adoption by mobile users
across primary campuses, as well as in satellite, branch, and
home offices. We intend to do so by emphasizing the productivity
enhancements and cost-efficiency of our approach. Network
rightsizing and Virtual Branch Networking are two pillars of
this strategy, helping users to enhance mobility, obtain a
uniform network experience for all users, and lower both
operating and capital expenditures.
|
| |
| |
|
Maintain and extend our software offerings We
believe that the integrated encryption, authentication, and
network access technology embedded in the ArubaOS operating
system are key competitive differentiators. We intend to
continue enhancing the ArubaOS operating system and our
centralized mobility architecture to maintain our position as a
technology innovator. We also intend to extend the functionality
and performance of the ArubaOS operating system with additional
software modules such as unified communications,
video-over-IP,
and location-based services. Finally, we intend to continue
enhancing the capabilities of our multi-vendor AirWave Wireless
Management Suite to support additional competitive products and
enhance the underlying features of this market-leading platform.
|
| |
| |
|
Utilize channel partners to expand our global market
penetration We intend to increase our market
penetration and extend our geographic reach through the
expansion of our network of channel partners. We
|
7
|
|
|
| |
|
plan to expand our growing channel footprint and will tailor
training and support programs to help drive this expansion.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Realize increased operating efficiencies We
currently outsource our hardware manufacturing to overseas
contract manufacturers such as Flextronics Manufacturing
Singapore Pte. Ltd. (Flextronics), Sercomm
Corporation (Sercomm), Accton Corporation
(Accton) and Wistron Corporation
(Wistron) and have established offshore research and
development and customer support capabilities. We plan to
continue to realize increased operating efficiencies by growing
these offshore operations, and by establishing additional
offshore capabilities for certain general and administrative
functions.
|
| |
| |
|
Expand our base of technology partners We
will continue expanding our network of technology partners to
enhance and complement our unified mobility solutions with
security solutions, management tools, connectivity devices, and
mobility applications.
|
Products
Our MOVE architecture unifies wired and wireless LANs into one
seamless access solution. This allows traveling business
professionals, remote workers, headquarters employees and guests
to obtain a secure network connection no matter
where they are, what computing devices they use or how they
connect.
To connect users to the network whether at work, at
home, or on the road we offer a set of access
on-ramps that include wireless, wired, and remote networking
products that are centrally controlled in the data center to
simplify deployment and management.
We also offer comprehensive mobility network services. Deployed
in the data center, these services perform device and user
authorization, enforce mobility and security policies, unify
network operations, and provide visibility into the RF
environment.
ArubaOS
ArubaOS is the operating system software for wired,
wireless and remote access products in our MOVE architecture. It
integrates user-based security, application-aware
radio-frequency services, and wireless LAN access to deliver a
scalable and secure mobile networking solution for large and
mid-sized enterprises.
ArubaOS comes standard with comprehensive centralized controls
and additional security and mobility functionality that can be
added or unlocked via licensed software modules.
Software
Modules for ArubaOS
Software modules extend the base capabilities of ArubaOS.
Current software modules include:
|
|
|
| |
|
The Policy Enforcement Firewall (PEF) ensures
secure network access for wired, wireless and remote users.
Access control policies are centrally defined and enforced on a
per-user or per-group basis and follow users no matter where
they roam.
|
| |
| |
|
RFProtect provides integrated wireless intrusion
protection to mitigate Wi-Fi security threats as well as
spectrum analysis, which provides visibility into sources of
radio frequency interference.
|
| |
| |
|
Advanced Cryptography (ACR) with
U.S. National Security Agency (NSA)-approved
Suite B cryptography enables secure access to networks that
handle sensitive but unclassified, confidential and classified
information.
|
| |
| |
|
The xSec protocol uses data encryption and other security
methods to safeguard wired and wireless connections. Compliant
with Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS)
140-2, xSec
protects extremely sensitive information on high-security
networks.
|
8
Mobility
Controllers
Our Mobility Controllers run the ArubaOS operating system,
creating a single mobile enterprise network that enforces
security policies and manages wired and wireless access across
indoor, outdoor and remote sites.
Aware of all users, devices, applications and locations, they
provide mobility and secure network access throughout the
extended enterprise. Mobility Controllers also maintain
configurations and automate software updates for access points,
Mobility Access Switches and other Mobility Controllers.
Highly scalable, our Mobility Controllers are designed to meet a
wide range of deployment scenarios, from branch offices and
retail stores to large campuses and extended multisite networks.
Access
Points
Our access points serve as on-ramps that aggregate user traffic
onto the enterprise network and direct the traffic to Mobility
Controllers. Available in a wide range of indoor and outdoor
versions, our access points connect authorized consumer and
commercial mobile devices using standard 802.11a/b/g/n Wi-Fi. In
addition to Wi-Fi connectivity, access points provide security
monitoring and interference avoidance.
Mobility
Access Switches
Our Mobility Access Switches provide secure network access for
wired users and devices based on their identity and independent
of their location or the applications they use. Installed in the
wiring closet, Mobility Access Switches provide wire-speed
Gigabit Ethernet and can enforce universal security policies
when operating with our Mobility Controllers.
Remote
Networks
Our remote networking products include Remote Access
Points, Aruba Instant and Virtual Intranet Access
client software.
|
|
|
| |
|
Remote Access Points (RAPs) provide secure
always-on network access to corporate enterprise networks from
remote locations. Ideal for small branch offices and teleworkers
in home offices, RAPs provide wired and wireless access, traffic
forwarding, security and backup connectivity over cellular
networks.
|
| |
| |
|
Combining high-end enterprise-class features with affordability
and
ease-of-use,
Aruba Instant is a family of 802.11n access points with
integrated Mobility Controller capabilities. Installed in
minutes using three easy steps, up to 16 Aruba Instant access
points can run at one site, and multiple sites can be remotely
managed from a central location.
|
| |
| |
|
Virtual Intranet Access (VIA) client software
provides secure network connectivity for Windows laptops and
MacBooks. Unlike other VPN clients, VIA chooses the best secure
connection to the enterprise network and automatically
configures wireless laptop settings to ensure a zero-touch user
experience. VIA also supports U.S. NSA Suite B
cryptography when used with the ArubaOS ACR module. With the ACR
module, VIA clients can securely access networks that handle
controlled unclassified, confidential and classified information.
|
Outdoor
Wireless Mesh Routers
Our AirMesh family of outdoor wireless mesh routers provide
secure Wi-Fi access and backhaul links to transport voice, video
and data traffic wirelessly over vast distances. Ideal where
wired connectivity is impractical or unavailable, AirMesh is
optimized for applications like video surveillance in municipal,
public safety and industrial deployments.
Management
and Security Software
Our management and security software includes AirWave
network management, Amigopod access management and
our cloud-based Content Security Service.
9
|
|
|
| |
|
AirWave network management provides
end-to-end
clarity and control to manage mobile and wired users on
multivendor, multisite networks. It features management and
wireless security tools such as user location and mapping,
real-time monitoring, proactive alerts, historical reporting,
and troubleshooting.
|
| |
| |
|
Amigopod provisions and manages secure wireless LAN access for
visitors, contractors, employees and their mobile devices.
Simple and automated self-registration makes it easy for
receptionists and non-IT staff to create temporary enterprise
Wi-Fi accounts.
|
| |
| |
|
From data centers around the world, our Content Security Service
(CSS) provides high-performance web security for
branch offices and teleworkers. CSS offers URL filtering,
peer-to-peer
control, anti-virus/anti-malware, data loss prevention and more.
|
Customers
Our products have been sold to over 15,500 end customers
worldwide (excluding end-customers of Alcatel-Lucent) in most
major industries including general enterprise, construction,
education, finance, government, healthcare, hospitality,
manufacturing, media, retail, technology, telecom,
transportation, and utilities. Our products are deployed in a
wide range of organizations from small organizations to large
multinational corporations, including:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Asia Pacific and Other
|
|
|
|
California State University
|
|
BAA
|
|
China University of Geoscience
|
|
Boston Medical Center
|
|
Saudi Aramco
|
|
Lawson
|
|
Seattle Police Department
|
|
Trafford Council
|
|
Tennis Australia
|
|
Microsoft
|
|
KPMG Netherlands
|
|
Port of Yokohama, Japan
|
|
United States Air Force
|
|
London School of Business
|
|
Samsung Medical Center
|
Customers purchase our products directly from us and through our
VARs, VADs and OEMs. For a description of our revenues based on
our customers geographic locations, see Note 11 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Sales and
Marketing
We sell our products and support directly through our sales
force and indirectly through our VAR, VAD and OEM partners:
|
|
|
| |
|
Our sales force We have a sales force in each
of the following regions: the Americas, Europe, Middle East and
Africa (EMEA), Asia Pacific (APAC) and
throughout the rest of the world. Each sales force is
responsible for managing all direct, as well as channel,
business within its designated geographic territory.
|
| |
| |
|
VARs, VADs and OEMs Our VARs, VADs and OEMs
market, sell, and deploy our solutions to a broad array of
organizations. Some of these VARs also purchase our solutions
and offer them to their end customers as a managed service. We
continue to grow the use of our channel partners in each of our
theatres of operations.
|
As part of our continuing efforts to improve operating leverage
through our channel partners we are increasingly relying on our
VARs, channel managers, and sales support team to manage
smaller-sized deals. This improves our sales productivity and
enables our direct sales teams to focus more on winning large
customers.
Our marketing activities include lead generation, tele-sales,
advertising, website operations, direct marketing, and public
relations, as well as participation at technology conferences
and trade shows.
Backlog
In our experience, the actual amount of product backlog at any
particular time is not a meaningful indication of our future
business prospects. We have orders for products that have not
been shipped and for services that have not yet been performed
for various reasons. Because we allow customers to cancel or
change orders with limited advance notice prior to shipment or
performance and because many orders remain in backlog due to
concerns about the credit
10
worthiness of the partner or customer, we do not consider
backlog to be firm and do not believe our backlog information is
a reliable indicator of our ability to achieve any particular
level of revenue or financial performance.
Customer
Service, Support and Training
We offer tiered customer service and support programs that
encompass hardware, software, and access to future software
upgrades on a
when-and-if
available basis. In order to better serve our customers, we have
multiple support centers available to respond 24x7x365. Service
and support for end customers of our VARs, VADs and OEMs are
typically provided by these channel partners, to whom we provide
back-up
support.
Our training department conducts basic and advanced courses
through an on-line training portal and
on-site at
customer locations, third-party regional training facilities,
and our headquarters training facility in Sunnyvale, California.
As part of our training program, we offer certification programs
to demonstrate that participants have successfully completed the
program and passed written and practical exams covering our
products, networking, and wireless technologies.
Research
and Development
Continued investment in research and development is critical to
our business. To this end, we have assembled a team of engineers
with expertise in various fields, including networking, security
and RF. Our research and development efforts are focused in
Sunnyvale, California, Bangalore, India and Beijing, China. We
have invested significant time and financial resources into the
development of our unified mobility solutions and architecture.
We will continue to expand our product offerings and solutions
capabilities in the future and plan to dedicate significant
resources to these continued research and development efforts.
Research and development expenses for fiscal years 2011, 2010,
and 2009 are disclosed in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
Manufacturing
We outsource the manufacturing of a significant majority of our
hardware products to contract manufacturers and original design
manufacturers (ODM). These manufacturing partners
help us optimize our operations by lowering costs and reducing
time to market. Our major manufacturing partners are
Flextronics, Sercomm, Accton and Wistron. Our manufacturing
agreement with each partner is structured similarly. The
agreements are automatically renewed each year for successive
one-year terms unless we or our manufacturing partner provides
at least 90 days advance written notice to the other
party of an intent not to renew. In addition, these agreements
may be terminated by us or our manufacturing partners for any
reason upon 180 days advance written notice to the
other party.
In addition, we utilize a Flextronics facility in Singapore for
limited production of specialized products and fulfillment
operations for all customer shipments destined for most APAC and
EMEA destinations. We also have a second fulfillment center
located in Sunnyvale, California that is responsible for all
customer shipments destined to locations in the Americas. We
perform rigorous in-house quality control inspection and testing
at both of our fulfillment centers to ensure the reliability and
quality of our hardware components.
We utilize components from many suppliers. Whenever possible, we
strive to have multiple sources for these components to ensure
continuous supply and competitive costs. We work in conjunction
with the extensive supply chain management organizations at all
of our manufacturing partners to select and utilize suppliers
with established delivery and quality track records. We source a
limited number of components that are technically unique and
only available from specific suppliers, but neither we nor our
manufacturing partners have entered into any long-term supply
agreements with these suppliers. Instead, we maintain close,
direct relationships with these suppliers to ensure supply meets
our requirements including, in some cases, entering into license
agreements that allow us to incorporate certain of their
components into our products.
We also incorporate certain generally available software
programs into our architecture pursuant to license agreements
with third parties. We have also entered into license agreements
with Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. (Atheros), Netlogic
Microsystems Corporation (Netlogic) and Broadcom
Corporation (Broadcom), each of which is a sole
supplier of certain components used by our manufacturing
partners, in the production of our products.
11
Although the contract manufacturing and ODM services required to
manufacture and assemble our products may be readily available
from a number of established manufacturers, it is time consuming
and costly to qualify and implement contract manufacturer
relationships. Therefore, if any of our manufacturing partners,
Atheros, Netlogic, Broadcom or any other sole source supplier
suffers an interruption in its business, or experiences delays,
disruptions or quality control problems in its manufacturing
operations, or we have to change or add additional manufacturing
partners or suppliers of our sole sourced components, our
ability to ship products to our customers would be delayed, and
our business, operating results and financial condition would be
adversely affected.
Competition
The market for secure mobility products is highly competitive
and constantly evolving. We believe that we compete primarily on
the basis of providing a comprehensive solution that enables
mobility, security, and the delivery of converged application
services. We believe other principal competitive factors in our
market include the total cost of ownership, performance of
software and hardware products, ability to deploy easily into
existing networks, interoperability of networks with other
devices, ability to easily scale, ability to provide secure
mobile access to the network, speed of mobile connectivity, and
ability to allow the centralized management of networks.
Our competitive position also depends on our ability to innovate
and adapt to meet the evolving needs of our customers. We
believe we compete favorably in each of these areas.
We expect competition to intensify in the future as other
companies introduce new products in the same markets we serve or
intend to enter. This competition could result in increased
pricing pressure, reduced profit margins, increased sales and
marketing expenses and failure to increase, or the loss of,
market share, any of which could seriously harm our business,
operating results or financial condition. If we do not keep pace
with product and technology advances, there could be a material
adverse effect on our competitive position, revenues and
prospects for growth.
Our primary competitors include Cisco Systems, primarily through
its Wireless Networking Business Unit, Hewlett-Packard, and
Motorola. We also face competition from a number of smaller
companies and new market entrants.
Key differentiators from the competition include the following:
|
|
|
| |
|
Field-proven in the worlds largest WLANs, our MOVE
architecture seamlessly unifies wired and wireless into one
cohesive network access solution, providing context-aware and
secure user access to appropriate network services. Adaptive
802.11n with infrastructure-based controls lowers customer costs
by simplifying deployments, as well as securely and reliably
delivering data, toll-grade voice, and high-definition video
applications.
|
| |
| |
|
We deliver NSA-developed Suite B military-grade security
for access control and data privacy.
|
| |
| |
|
Our Virtual Branch Network (VBN) solution delivers
the security of VPN, the economy of broadband, the simplicity of
one-touch installation and the efficiency of centralized
management for teleworkers and small branch offices.
|
| |
| |
|
The AirWave Wireless Management Suite enhances operations
management, reduces complexity and support costs, and extends
the life of existing infrastructure through a multi-vendor,
user-centric approach.
|
Intellectual
Property
Our success as a company depends critically upon our ability to
protect our core technology and intellectual property. To
accomplish this, we rely on a combination of intellectual
property rights including patents, trade secrets, copyrights and
trademarks, as well as customary contractual protections.
We have been granted several United States patents, and have a
growing pending patent portfolio. We intend to file counterparts
for these patents and patent applications in other jurisdictions
around the world as appropriate.
Our registered trademarks are Aruba
Networks®,
Aruba Wireless
Networks®,
the registered Aruba the Mobile Edge Company logo, Aruba
Mobility Management
System®,
Mobile Edge
Architecture®,
People Move. Networks Must
Follow®,
RFProtect®,
and Green
Island®.
In addition to the foregoing protections, we generally control
access to and use of our proprietary software and other
confidential information through the use of internal and
external controls, including contractual protections with
employees, contractors, customers and partners, and our software
is protected by United States and international copyright laws.
12
Corporate
Information
We were incorporated in Delaware in February 2002. Our principal
executive offices are located at 1344 Crossman Ave., Sunnyvale,
California
94089-1113,
and our telephone number is
(408) 227-4500.
Our website address is www.arubanetworks.com
Employees
As of July 31, 2011, we had approximately
1,057 employees worldwide, of which 422 were engaged in
sales and marketing, 426 were engaged in research and
development, 111 were engaged in general and administrative
functions, 65 were engaged in customer services and 33 were
engaged in operations. None of our employees are represented by
labor unions, and we consider current employee relations to be
good.
Website
Posting of SEC Filings
Our annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K
and amendments to such reports are available, free of charge, as
soon as reasonably practical after they are electronically filed
or furnished with the SEC, on our website and can be accessed by
clicking on the Company/Investor Relations tab.
Further, copies of materials filed by us with the SEC may be
read and copied at the SECs Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549.
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be
obtained by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy
and information statements and other information regarding our
filings at www.sec.gov. The contents of our website are
not incorporated into, or otherwise to be regarded as a part of,
this report or any other report we file with or furnish to the
SEC.
Set forth below and elsewhere in this report, and in other
documents we file with the SEC, are risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from the results
contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this
report and in our other public statements. Because of the
following factors, as well as other factors affecting our
financial condition and operating results, past financial
performance should not be considered to be a reliable indicator
of future performance, and investors should not use historical
trends to anticipate results or trends in future periods.
Risks
Related to Our Business and Industry
Our
business, operating results and growth rates may be adversely
affected by unfavorable economic and market
conditions.
Our business depends on the overall demand for IT and on the
economic health and general willingness of our current and
prospective customers to make capital commitments. If the
conditions in the U.S. and global economic environment
remain uncertain or continue to be volatile, or if they
deteriorate further, our business, operating results, and
financial condition may be materially adversely affected.
Economic weakness, customer financial difficulties and
constrained spending on IT initiatives have resulted, and may in
the future result, in challenging and delayed sales cycles and
could negatively impact our ability to forecast future periods.
In particular, we cannot be assured of the level of IT spending,
the deterioration of which could have a material adverse effect
on our results of operations and growth rates. The purchase of
our products or willingness to replace existing infrastructure
in some vertical markets may be discretionary and may involve a
significant commitment of capital and other resources.
Therefore, weak economic conditions, or a reduction in IT
spending would likely adversely impact our business, operating
results and financial condition in a number of ways, including
longer sales cycles, lower prices for our products and services,
and reduced unit sales. A reduction in IT spending could occur
or persist even if economic conditions improve. In addition, if
interest rates rise or foreign exchange rates weaken for our
international customers, overall demand for our products and
services could be further dampened, and related IT spending may
be reduced. Furthermore, any increase in worldwide commodity
prices may result in higher component prices and increased
shipping costs, both of which may negatively impact our
financial results.
13
We
compete in new and rapidly evolving markets and have a limited
operating history, which makes it difficult to predict our
future operating results.
We were incorporated in February 2002 and began commercial
shipments of our products in June 2003. As a result of our
limited operating history, it is very difficult to forecast our
future operating results. In addition, we operate in an industry
characterized by rapid technological change. Our prospects
should be considered and evaluated in light of the risks and
uncertainties frequently encountered by companies in rapidly
evolving markets characterized by rapid technological change,
changing customer needs, evolving industry standards and
frequent introductions of new products and services. These risks
and difficulties include challenges in accurate financial
planning as a result of limited historical data and the
uncertainties resulting from having had a relatively limited
time period in which to implement and evaluate our business
strategies as compared to older companies with longer operating
histories.
In addition, our products are designed to be compatible with
industry standards for secure communications over wireless and
wireline networks. As we encounter changing standards, customer
requirements and competitive pressures, we likely will be
required to reposition our product and service offerings and
introduce new products and services. We may not be successful in
doing so in a timely and appropriately responsive manner, or at
all. Our failure to address these risks and difficulties
successfully could materially harm our business and operating
results.
Our
operating results may fluctuate significantly, which makes our
future results difficult to predict and could cause our
operating results to fall below expectations or our
guidance.
Our annual and quarterly operating results have fluctuated in
the past and may fluctuate significantly in the future, which
makes it difficult for us to predict. Our operating results may
fluctuate due to a variety of factors, many of which are outside
of our control, including the changing and volatile
U.S. and global economic environment, and any of which may
cause our stock price to fluctuate. As a result, comparing our
operating results on a
period-to-period
basis may not be meaningful. You should not rely on our past
results as an indication of our future performance.
Furthermore, our product revenues generally reflect orders
shipped in the same quarter they are received, and a substantial
portion of our orders are often received in the last month of
each fiscal quarter, a trend that may continue. As a result, if
we are unable to ship orders received in the last month of each
fiscal quarter, even though we may have business indicators
about customer demand during a quarter, we may experience
revenue shortfalls, and such shortfalls may materially adversely
affect our earnings because we may not be able to adequately and
timely adjust our expense levels.
In addition to other risk factors listed in this Risk
Factors section, factors that may cause our operating
results to fluctuate include:
|
|
|
| |
|
the impact of unfavorable worldwide economic and market
conditions, including the restricted credit environment
impacting the credit of our channel partners and end user
customers;
|
| |
| |
|
our ability to develop and maintain our relationships with our
VARs, VADs, OEMs and other partners;
|
| |
| |
|
fluctuations in demand, sales cycles and prices for our products
and services;
|
| |
| |
|
reductions in customers budgets for information technology
purchases and delays in their purchasing cycles;
|
| |
| |
|
the sale of our products in the timeframes we anticipate,
including the number and size of orders in each quarter;
|
| |
| |
|
our ability to develop, introduce and ship in a timely manner,
new products and product enhancements that meet customer
requirements;
|
| |
| |
|
our dependence on several large vertical markets, including the
government, healthcare, retail, enterprise and education
vertical markets;
|
| |
| |
|
the timing of product releases or upgrades by us or by our
competitors;
|
14
|
|
|
| |
|
any significant changes in the competitive dynamics of our
markets, including new entrants, or further consolidation;
|
| |
| |
|
our ability to control costs, including our operating expenses,
and the costs of the components we purchase;
|
| |
| |
|
product mix and average selling prices, as well as increased
discounting of products by us and our competitors;
|
| |
| |
|
the proportion of our products that are sold through direct
versus indirect channels;
|
| |
| |
|
our ability to maintain volume manufacturing pricing from our
contract manufacturers, and our component suppliers;
|
| |
| |
|
our contract manufacturers and component suppliers ability
to meet our product demand forecasts;
|
| |
| |
|
the potential need to record incremental inventory reserves for
products that may become obsolete due to our new product
introductions;
|
| |
| |
|
growth in our headcount and other related costs incurred in our
customer support organization;
|
| |
| |
|
changing market conditions, including current and potential
customer consolidation;
|
| |
| |
|
any decision to increase or decrease operating expenses in
response to changes in the marketplace or perceived marketplace
opportunities;
|
| |
| |
|
our ability to derive benefits from our investments in sales,
marketing, engineering or other activities;
|
| |
| |
|
volatility in our stock price, which may lead to higher stock
compensation expenses;
|
| |
| |
|
fluctuations in our effective tax rate, changes in the valuation
of our deferred tax assets or liabilities, changes in actual
results versus our estimates, or changes in tax laws,
regulations, accounting principles, or interpretations thereof;
|
| |
| |
|
the timing of revenue recognition in any given quarter as a
result of revenue recognition rules;
|
| |
| |
|
the regulatory environment for the certification and sale of our
products; and
|
| |
| |
|
seasonal demand for our products, some of which may not be
currently evident due to our revenue growth during fiscal 2010
and 2011.
|
As a result, our quarterly operating results are difficult to
predict even in the near term. In one or more future quarterly
periods, our operating results may fall below the expectations
of securities analysts and investors or below any guidance we
may provide to the market. In this event, the trading price of
our common stock could decline significantly. Such a stock price
decline could occur even when we have met our publicly stated
revenue
and/or
earnings guidance.
We
expect our gross margins to vary over time and our recent level
of product gross margin may not be sustainable.
Our product gross margins vary from quarter to quarter and the
recent level of gross margins may not be sustainable and may be
adversely affected in the future by numerous factors, including
product or sales channel mix shifts, the percentage of revenue
from international regions, increased price competition,
increases in material or labor costs, excess product component
or obsolescence charges from our contract manufacturers,
write-downs for obsolete or excess inventory, increased costs
due to changes in component pricing or charges incurred due to
component holding periods if our forecasts do not accurately
anticipate product demand, warranty-related issues, product
discounting, freight charges, or our introduction of new
products or new product platforms or entry into new markets with
different pricing and cost structures. As a result of any of
these factors, or other factors, our gross margin may be
adversely affected, which in turn would harm our operating
results.
15
In our
recent history we have incurred net losses and while we are
currently profitable, we may not sustain profitability in the
future.
We have a history of losses and only recently achieved
profitability. We generated net income of $70.7 million for
fiscal year 2011 and suffered net losses of $34.0 million
and $23.4 million for fiscal years 2010 and 2009,
respectively. As of July 31, 2011 and 2010, our accumulated
deficit was $104.9 million and $175.6 million,
respectively. Expenses associated with the continued development
and expansion of our business, including expenditures to hire
additional personnel for sales and marketing and technology
development, could limit our ability to sustain operating
profits. If we fail to increase revenues or manage our cost
structure, we may not sustain profitability in the future. As a
result, our business could be harmed, and our stock price could
decline.
Our
sales cycles can be long and unpredictable, and our sales
efforts require considerable time and expense. As a result, our
sales are difficult to predict and may vary substantially from
quarter to quarter, which may cause our operating results to
fluctuate significantly.
The timing of our revenues is difficult to predict. Our sales
efforts involve educating our customers about the use and
benefits of our products, including the technical capabilities
of our products and the potential cost savings achieved by
organizations that utilize our products. Customers typically
undertake a significant evaluation process, which frequently
involves not only our products but also those of our competitors
and can result in a lengthy sales cycle, which typically ranges
four to nine months in length but can be as long as
18 months. We spend substantial time, effort and money in
our sales efforts without any assurance that our efforts will
produce any sales. Even after making the decision to purchase,
customers may deploy our products slowly and deliberately. In
addition, product purchases are frequently subject to budget
constraints, multiple approvals, and unplanned administrative,
processing and other delays. Specifically, we view the federal
vertical as highly dependent on large transactions, and
therefore we could experience fluctuations from period to period
in this vertical. Customers may also defer purchases as a result
of anticipated or announced releases of new products or
enhancements by our competitors or by us. Product purchases
could be delayed by the volatile U.S. and global economic
environment, which has introduced additional risk into our
ability to accurately forecast sales in a particular quarter. If
sales expected from a specific customer for a particular quarter
are not realized in that quarter or at all, our business,
operating results and financial condition could be materially
adversely affected.
The
market in which we compete is highly competitive, and
competitive pressures from existing and new companies may have a
material adverse effect on our business, revenues, growth rates
and market share.
The market in which we compete is highly competitive and is
influenced by the following competitive factors:
|
|
|
| |
|
comprehensiveness of the solution;
|
| |
| |
|
performance of software and hardware products;
|
| |
| |
|
ability to deploy easily into existing networks;
|
| |
| |
|
interoperability with other devices;
|
| |
| |
|
scalability of solution;
|
| |
| |
|
ability to provide secure mobile access to the network;
|
| |
| |
|
speed of mobile connectivity offering;
|
| |
| |
|
initial price, total cost of ownership, and
return-on-investment;
|
| |
| |
|
ability to allow centralized management of products; and
|
| |
| |
|
ability to obtain regulatory and other industry certifications.
|
We expect competition to intensify in the future as other
companies introduce new products in the same markets we serve or
intend to enter and as the market continues to consolidate. This
competition could result in increased pricing pressure, reduced
profit margins, increased sales and marketing expenses and
failure to increase, or the loss of, market share, any of which
would likely seriously harm our business, operating results or
financial
16
condition. If we do not keep pace with product and technology
advances, there could be a material adverse effect on our
competitive position, revenues and prospects for growth.
Competitive products may in the future have better performance,
more and/or
better features, lower prices and broader acceptance than our
products. A number of our current or potential competitors have
longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger
customer bases and significantly greater financial, technical,
sales, marketing and other resources than we do. Potential
customers may prefer to purchase from their existing suppliers
rather than a new supplier, regardless of product performance or
features. Currently, we compete with a number of large and well
established public companies, including Cisco Systems (primarily
through its Wireless Networking Business Unit), Hewlett-Packard
and Motorola, as well as smaller companies and new market
entrants, any of which could reduce our market share, require us
to lower our prices, or both.
We expect increased competition from our current competitors, as
well as other established and emerging companies, if our market
continues to develop and expand. Our channel partners could
market products and services that compete with our products and
services. In addition, some of our competitors have made
acquisitions or entered into partnerships or other strategic
relationships with one another to offer a more comprehensive
solution than they individually had offered. We expect this
trend to continue as companies attempt to strengthen or maintain
their market positions in an evolving industry and as companies
enter into partnerships or are acquired. Many of the companies
driving this consolidation trend have significantly greater
financial, technical and other resources than we do and are
better positioned to acquire and offer complementary products
and technologies. The companies resulting from these possible
consolidations may create more compelling product offerings and
be able to offer greater pricing flexibility, making it more
difficult for us to compete effectively, including on the basis
of price, sales and marketing programs, technology or product
functionality. Continued industry consolidation may adversely
impact customers perceptions of the viability of smaller
and even medium-sized technology companies and, consequently,
customers willingness to purchase from such companies.
These pressures could materially adversely affect our business,
operating results and financial condition.
We
sell a majority of our products through VADs, VARs, and OEMs. If
these channel partners on which we rely do not perform their
services adequately or efficiently, or if they exit the
industry, are acquired by a competitor, or have financial
difficulties, there could be a material adverse effect on our
revenues and our cash flow.
Our future success is highly dependent upon establishing and
maintaining successful relationships with a variety of VADs,
VARs, and OEMs, which we refer to as our indirect channel. We
have dedicated a significant amount of effort to increase the
use of our VADs and VARs in each of our theatres of operations.
The percentage of our total revenues fulfilled from sales
through our indirect channel was 93.0%, 92.4%, and 84.6% for
fiscal years 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively. We expect that
over time, indirect channel sales will continue to constitute a
significant majority of our total revenues. Accordingly, our
revenues depend in large part on the effective performance of
our channel partners. Three of our channel partners accounted
for more than 10% of total revenues for fiscal year 2011, 2010
and 2009. The table below represents the percentage of total
revenues from our top channel partners (*denotes less than 10%):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
ScanSource, Inc. (Catalyst)
|
|
|
19.4
|
%
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Avnet Logistics U.S. LP
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
|
Alcatel-Lucent
|
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
|
14.5
|
%
|
Our agreements with our partners provide that they use
reasonable commercial efforts to sell our products on a
perpetual basis unless the agreement is otherwise terminated by
either party. Our agreement with Alcatel-Lucent contains a
most-favored nations clause, pursuant to which we
agreed to lower the price at which we sell products to
Alcatel-Lucent in the event that we agree to sell the same or
similar products at a lower price to a similar customer on the
same or similar terms and conditions. However, the specific
terms of this most-favored nations clause are narrow
and specific, and we have not to date incurred any obligations
related to this term in the agreement.
17
Some of our indirect channel partners may have insufficient
financial resources and may not be able to withstand changes in
worldwide business conditions, including economic downturns,
abide by our inventory and credit requirements, or have the
ability to meet their financial obligations to us. The table
below represents the percentage of total accounts receivable
from our top channel partners (*denotes less than 10%):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
ScanSource, Inc. (Catalyst)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
31.6
|
%
|
|
Avnet Logistics U.S. LP
|
|
|
23.8
|
%
|
|
|
18.2
|
%
|
|
Alcatel-Lucent
|
|
|
18.4
|
%
|
|
|
*
|
|
If the indirect channel partners on which we rely do not perform
their services adequately or efficiently, fail to meet their
obligations to us, or if they exit the industry and we are not
able to quickly find adequate replacements, there could be a
material adverse effect on our revenues, cash flow and market
share. By relying on these indirect channels, we may have less
contact with the end users of our products, thereby making it
more difficult for us to establish brand awareness, ensure
proper delivery and installation of our products, service
ongoing customer requirements and respond to evolving customer
needs. In addition, our indirect channel partners may receive
pricing terms that allow for volume discounts off of list prices
for the products they purchase from us, which reduce our margins
to the extent revenues from such channel partners increase as a
proportion of our overall revenues.
Recruiting and retaining qualified channel partners and training
them in our technology and product offerings requires
significant time and resources. In order to develop and expand
our distribution channel, we must continue to scale and improve
our processes and procedures that support our channel partners,
including investment in systems and training, and those
processes and procedures may become increasingly complex and
difficult to manage. We have no minimum purchase commitments
with any of our VADs, VARs, or OEMs, and our contracts with
these channel partners do not prohibit them from offering
products or services that compete with ours or from terminating
our contract on short notice. Our competitors may be effective
in providing incentives to existing and potential channel
partners to favor their products or to prevent or reduce sales
of our products. Our channel partners may choose not to focus
primarily on the sale of our products or offer our products at
all. Our failure to establish and maintain successful
relationships with indirect channel partners would likely
materially adversely affect our business, operating results and
financial condition.
We
depend upon the development of new products and enhancements to
our existing products. If we fail to predict and respond to
emerging technological trends and our customers changing
needs, we may not be able to remain competitive.
We may not be able to anticipate future market needs or be able
to develop new products or product enhancements to meet such
needs, either on a timely basis or at all. For example, we
anticipate a need to continue to increase the mobility of our
solution, and certain customers have delayed, and may in the
future delay, purchases of our products until either new
versions of those products are available or the customer
evaluations are completed. If we fail to develop new products or
product enhancements, our business could be adversely affected,
especially if our competitors are able to introduce solutions
with such increased functionality. In addition, as new mobile
applications are introduced, our success may depend on our
ability to provide a solution that supports these applications.
We are active in the research and development of new products
and technologies and enhancing our current products. However,
research and development in the enterprise mobility industry is
complex and filled with uncertainty. If we expend a significant
amount of resources on research and development and our efforts
do not lead to the successful introduction of products that are
competitive in the marketplace, there could be a material
adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial
condition and market share. In addition, it is common for
research and development projects to encounter delays due to
unforeseen problems, resulting in low initial volume production,
fewer product features than originally considered desirable and
higher production costs than initially budgeted, which may
result in lost market opportunities. In addition, any new
products or product enhancements that we introduce may not
achieve any significant degree of market acceptance or be
accepted into our sales channel by our channel partners. There
could be a material adverse effect on our business, operating
results, financial
18
condition and market share due to such delays or deficiencies in
the development, manufacturing and delivery of new products.
Once a product is in the marketplace, its selling price often
decreases over the life of the product, especially after a new
competitive product is publicly announced. To lessen the effect
of price decreases, our product management team attempts to
reduce development and manufacturing costs in order to maintain
or improve our margins. However, if cost reductions do not occur
in a timely manner, there could be a material adverse effect on
our operating results and market share. Further, the
introduction of new products may decrease the demand for older
products currently included in our inventory balances. As a
result, we may need to record incremental inventory reserves for
the older products that we do not expect to sell. This may have
a material adverse effect on our operating results and market
share.
We manufacture our products to comply with standards established
by various standards bodies, including the Institute of
Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE).
If we are not able to adapt to new or changing standards that
are ratified by these bodies, our ability to sell our products
may be adversely affected. For example, prior to the
ratification of the 802.11n wireless LAN standard
(11n) by the IEEE in 2009, we had been developing
and were offering for sale products that complied with the draft
standard that the IEEE had not yet ratified. Although the IEEE
ratified the 11n standard and did not modify the draft of the
11n standard, the IEEE could modify the standard in the future.
We remain subject to any changes adopted by various standards
bodies, which would require us to modify our products to comply
with the new standards, require additional time and expense and
could cause a disruption in our ability to market and sell the
affected products.
We may
engage in future acquisitions that could disrupt our business,
cause dilution to our stockholders and harm our business,
operating results and financial condition.
In December 2010, we completed our acquisition of substantially
all of the assets of Amigopod and in September 2010, we
completed our acquisition of Azalea Networks
(Azalea). In the future we may acquire other
businesses, products or technologies. However, we may not be
able to find suitable acquisition candidates, and we may not be
able to complete acquisitions on favorable terms, if at all. If
we do complete acquisitions, we may not ultimately strengthen
our competitive position or achieve our goals. These
acquisitions and any future acquisitions may be viewed
negatively by customers, financial markets or investors. In
addition, these acquisitions and any future acquisitions that we
may make could lead to difficulties in integrating personnel and
operations from the acquired businesses and in retaining and
motivating key personnel from these businesses. We may also
encounter difficulties in maintaining uniform standards,
controls, procedures and policies across locations, or in
managing geographically or culturally diverse locations. We may
experience significant problems with acquired or integrated
product quality. We may also experience significant liabilities
associated with acquired or integrated technology. Acquisitions
may disrupt our ongoing operations, divert management from
day-to-day
responsibilities, increase our expenses and adversely impact our
business, operating results and financial condition. Future
acquisitions may reduce our cash available for operations and
other uses and could result in an increase in amortization
expense related to identifiable assets acquired, potentially
dilutive issuances of equity securities or the incurrence of
debt, which could harm our business, operating results and
financial condition.
As a
result of the fact that we outsource the manufacturing of our
products to contract manufacturers, we do not have the ability
to ensure quality control over the manufacturing process.
Furthermore, if there are significant changes in the financial
or business condition of our contract manufacturers, our ability
to supply quality products to our customers may be
disrupted.
As a result of the fact that we outsource the manufacturing of
our products to contract manufacturers, we are subject to the
risk of supplier failure and customer dissatisfaction with the
quality or performance of our products. Quality or performance
failures of our products or changes in the financial or business
condition of our contract manufacturers could disrupt our
ability to supply quality products to our customers and thereby
have a material adverse effect on our business, revenues and
financial condition.
We rely on purchase orders or long-term contracts with our
contract manufacturers. Some of our contract manufacturers are
not obligated to supply products to us for any specific period,
in any specific quantity or at any
19
specific price. Our orders with our contract manufacturers
represent a relatively small percentage of the overall orders
received by them from their customers. As a result, fulfilling
our orders may not be considered a priority in the event our
contract manufacturers are constrained in their abilities to
fulfill all of their customer obligations in a timely manner. We
provide demand forecasts to our contract manufacturers. To the
extent that any such demand forecast is binding, if we
overestimate our requirements, our contract manufacturers may
assess charges, or we may have liabilities for excess inventory,
each of which could negatively affect our gross margins.
Conversely, because lead times for required materials and
components vary significantly and depend on factors such as the
specific supplier, contract terms and the demand for each
component at a given time, if we underestimate our requirements,
our contract manufacturers may have inadequate materials and
components required to produce our products. This could result
in an interruption of the manufacturing of our products, delays
in shipments and deferral or loss of revenue. In addition, on
occasion we have underestimated our requirements, and, as a
result, we have been required to pay additional fees to our
contract manufacturers in order for manufacturing to be
completed and shipments to be made on a timely basis.
It is time consuming and costly to qualify and implement
contract manufacturer relationships. If any of our contract
manufacturers suffer an interruption in their business, or
experiences delays, disruptions or quality control problems in
their manufacturing operations, or we have to change or add
additional contract manufacturers, our ability to ship products
to our customers would be delayed, and our business, operating
results and financial condition would be adversely affected. In
addition, the majority of our manufacturing is performed
overseas and is therefore subject to risks associated with doing
business in other countries.
Our
contract manufacturers purchase some components, subassemblies
and products from a single supplier or a limited number of
suppliers, and with respect to some of these suppliers, we have
entered into license agreements that allow us to use their
components in our products. The loss of any of these suppliers
or the termination of any of these license agreements may cause
us to incur additional
set-up
costs, result in delays in manufacturing and delivering our
products, or cause us to carry excess or obsolete
inventory.
Shortages in components that we use in our products are
possible, and our ability to predict the availability of such
components may be limited. While components and supplies are
generally available from a variety of sources, we currently
depend on a limited number of suppliers for several components
for our equipment and certain subassemblies and products. We
rely on our contract manufacturers to obtain the components,
subassemblies and products necessary for the manufacture of our
products, including those components, subassemblies and products
that are only available from a single supplier or a limited
number of suppliers.
For example, our solution incorporates both software products
and hardware products, including a series of high-performance
programmable mobility controllers and a line of wired and
wireless access points. The chipsets that our contract
manufacturers source and incorporate in our hardware products
are currently available only from a limited number of suppliers,
with whom neither we nor our contract manufacturers have entered
into supply agreements. All of our access points incorporate
components from Atheros, and some of our mobility controllers
incorporate components from Broadcom and Netlogic. We have
entered into license agreements with Atheros, Broadcom and
Netlogic, the termination of which could have a material adverse
effect on our business. Our license agreements with Atheros,
Broadcom and Netlogic have perpetual terms in that they will
automatically be renewed for successive one-year periods unless
the agreement is terminated prior to the end of the then-current
term. As there are no other sources for identical components, in
the event that our contract manufacturers are unable to obtain
these components from Atheros, Broadcom or Netlogic, we would be
required to redesign our hardware and software in order to
incorporate components from alternative sources. All of our
product revenues are dependent upon the sale of products that
incorporate components from Atheros, Broadcom or Netlogic.
In addition, increased demand by third parties for the
components, subassemblies and products we use in our products
may lead to decreased availability and higher prices for those
components, subassemblies and products. For certain components,
subassemblies and products for which there are multiple sources,
we are still subject to potential price increases and limited
availability due to market demand for such components,
subassemblies and products. In the past, unexpected demand for
communication products caused worldwide shortages of certain
electronic parts. If such shortages occur in the future, our
business would be adversely affected. We carry very little
20
to no inventory of our product components, and we and our
contract manufacturers rely on our suppliers to deliver
necessary components in a timely manner. We and our contract
manufacturers rely on purchase orders rather than long-term
contracts with these suppliers. As a result, even if available,
we or our contract manufacturers may not be able to secure
sufficient components at reasonable prices or of acceptable
quality to build products in a timely manner and, therefore, may
not be able to meet customer demands for our products, which
would have a material adverse effect on our business, operating
results and financial condition.
Our
international sales and operations subject us to additional
risks that may adversely affect our operating
results.
We derive a significant portion of our revenues from customers
outside the United States. We have sales and technical support
personnel in numerous countries worldwide. In addition, a
portion of our engineering and order management efforts are
currently handled by personnel located in India and China, and
we expect to expand our offshore development efforts within
India and China and possibly in other countries. We expect to
continue to add personnel in additional countries. Our
international operations subject us to a variety of risks,
including:
|
|
|
| |
|
the difficulty and cost of managing and staffing international
offices and the increased travel, infrastructure and legal
compliance costs associated with multiple international
locations;
|
| |
| |
|
difficulties in enforcing contracts and collecting accounts
receivable, and longer payment cycles, especially in emerging
markets;
|
| |
| |
|
the need to localize our products for international customers;
|
| |
| |
|
tariffs and trade barriers, export regulations and other
regulatory or contractual limitations on our ability to sell or
develop our products in certain foreign markets;
|
| |
| |
|
increased exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk;
|
| |
| |
|
increased exposure to political and economic instability, war
and terrorism;
|
| |
| |
|
unfavorable changes in tax treaties or laws;
|
| |
| |
|
limited protection for intellectual property rights in some
countries; and
|
| |
| |
|
increased cost of terminating international employees in some
countries.
|
Foreign currencies periodically experience rapid fluctuations in
value against the U.S. dollar. Any foreign currency
devaluation against the U.S. dollar increases the real cost
of our products to our customers and partners in foreign markets
where we sell in U.S. dollars, which has resulted in the
past and may result in the future in delayed or cancelled
purchases of our products and, as a result, lower revenues. In
addition, this increase in cost increases the risk to us that we
will be unable to collect amounts owed to us by such customers
or partners, which in turn would impact our revenues and could
materially adversely impact our business and financial results.
Any devaluation may also lead us to more aggressively discount
our prices in foreign markets in order to maintain competitive
pricing, which would negatively impact our revenues and gross
margins. Conversely, a weakened U.S. dollar could increase
the cost of local operating expenses and procurement of raw
materials to the extent we purchase components in foreign
currencies.
As we continue to expand our business globally, our success will
depend, in large part, on our ability to anticipate and
effectively manage these and other risks associated with our
international operations. Our failure to manage any of these
risks successfully could harm our international operations and
reduce our international sales, adversely affecting our
business, operating results and financial condition.
If we
are unable to protect our intellectual property rights, our
competitive position could be harmed or we could be required to
incur significant expenses to enforce our rights.
We depend on our ability to protect our proprietary technology.
We protect our proprietary information and technology through
licensing agreements, third-party nondisclosure agreements and
other contractual provisions, as well as through patent,
trademark, copyright and trade secret laws in the United States
and similar laws in other
21
countries. There can be no assurance that these protections will
be available in all cases or will be adequate to prevent our
competitors from copying, reverse engineering or otherwise
obtaining and using our technology, proprietary rights or
products. For example, the laws of certain countries in which
our products are manufactured or licensed do not protect our
proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United
States. In addition, third parties may seek to challenge,
invalidate or circumvent our patents, trademarks, copyrights and
trade secrets, or applications for any of the foregoing. There
can be no assurance that our competitors will not independently
develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or
superior to our technology or design around our proprietary
rights. In each case, our ability to compete could be
significantly impaired. To prevent substantial unauthorized use
of our intellectual property rights, it may be necessary to
prosecute actions for infringement
and/or
misappropriation of our proprietary rights against third
parties. Any such action could result in significant costs and
diversion of our resources and managements attention, and
there can be no assurance that we will be successful in such
action. Furthermore, many of our current and potential
competitors have the ability to dedicate substantially greater
resources to enforce their intellectual property rights than we
do. Accordingly, despite our efforts, we may not be able to
prevent third parties from infringing upon or misappropriating
our intellectual property.
Claims
by others that we infringe their intellectual property rights
could harm our business.
Third parties have asserted and may in the future assert claims
of infringement of intellectual property rights against us or
against our customers or channel partners for which we may be
liable. Due to the rapid pace of technological change in our
industry, much of our business and many of our products rely on
proprietary technologies of third parties, and we may not be
able to obtain, or continue to obtain, licenses from such third
parties on reasonable terms. Technology companies frequently
enter into litigation based on allegations of patent
infringement or other violations of intellectual property
rights. In addition, patent holding companies seek to monetize
patents they have purchased or otherwise obtained. As our
business expands and the number of products and competitors in
our market increases and overlaps occur, we expect that
infringement claims may increase in number and significance.
Intellectual property lawsuits are subject to inherent
uncertainties due to the complexity of the technical issues
involved, and we cannot be certain that we will be successful in
defending ourselves against intellectual property claims.
Furthermore, a successful claimant could secure a judgment that
requires us to pay substantial damages or prevents us from
distributing certain products or performing certain services. In
addition, we might be required to seek a license for the use of
such intellectual property, which may not be available on
commercially acceptable terms or at all. Alternatively, we may
be required to develop non-infringing technology, which could
require significant effort and expense and may ultimately not be
successful. Any claims or proceedings against us, whether
meritorious or not, could be time consuming, result in costly
litigation, require significant amounts of management time,
result in the diversion of significant operational resources, or
require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements.
Impairment
of our goodwill or other assets would negatively affect our
results of operations.
Our acquisitions have resulted in total goodwill of
$33.1 million and intangible assets of $20.9 million
as of July 31, 2011. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment at
least annually or sooner under certain circumstances. Other
intangible assets that are deemed to have finite useful lives
are amortized over their useful lives but must be reviewed for
impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable.
Screening for and assessing whether impairment indicators exist,
or if events or changes in circumstances have occurred,
including market conditions, operating fundamentals, competition
and general economic conditions, requires significant judgment.
Therefore, we cannot assure you that a charge to operations will
not occur as a result of future goodwill and intangible asset
impairment tests. If impairment is deemed to exist, we would
write down the recorded value of these intangible assets to
their fair values. If and when these write-downs do occur, they
could harm our business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
22
If we
lose members of our senior management or are unable to recruit
and retain key employees on a cost-effective basis, or if we
fail to effectively integrate new officers into our
organization, our business could be harmed.
Our success is substantially dependent upon the performance of
our senior management. All of our executive officers are at-will
employees, and we do not maintain any key-man life insurance
policies. The loss of the services of any members of our
management team may significantly delay or prevent the
achievement of our product development and other business
objectives and could harm our business. Our success also is
substantially dependent upon our ability to attract additional
personnel for all areas of our organization, particularly in our
sales, research and development, and customer service
departments. Experienced management and technical, sales,
marketing and support personnel in the IT industry are in high
demand, and competition for their talents is intense.
Additionally, fluctuations or a sustained decrease in the price
of our stock could affect our ability to attract and retain such
personnel. When our stock price declines, our equity incentive
awards may lose retention value, which may negatively affect our
ability to attract and retain such personnel. We may not be
successful in attracting and retaining such personnel on a
timely basis, on competitive terms, or at all. The loss of, or
the inability to recruit, such employees could have a material
adverse effect on our business.
Our future performance will depend in part on our ability to
successfully integrate any new executive officers into our
management team and develop an effective working relationship
among senior management. For example, we have a new Chief
Financial Officer. If we fail to integrate our new Chief
Financial Officer, or any other executive officer whom we may
hire in the future, and create effective working relationships
among them and other members of management, our business
operating results and financial condition could be adversely
affected.
If we
fail to manage future growth effectively, our business would be
harmed.
We have expanded our operations significantly since inception
and anticipate that further significant expansion will be
required. We intend to increase our market penetration and
extend our geographic reach through our network of channel
partners. We also plan to increase offshore operations by
establishing additional offshore capabilities for certain
engineering and general and administrative functions. This
future growth, if it occurs, will place significant demands on
our management, infrastructure and other resources. To manage
any future growth, we will need to hire, integrate and retain
highly skilled and motivated employees. We will also need to
continue to improve and expand our information technology and
financial infrastructure, operating and administrative systems
and controls, and continue to manage headcount, capital and
processes in an efficient manner. Our failure to improve our
systems and processes, or their failure to operate in the
intended manner, may result in our inability to manage the
growth of our business and to accurately forecast our revenues,
expenses and earnings, or to prevent certain losses. Any future
growth would add complexity to our organization and require
effective coordination within our organization. If we do not
effectively manage our growth, our business, operating results
and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Our
ability to sell our products is highly dependent on the quality
of our support and services offerings, and our failure to offer
high quality support and services would have a material adverse
effect on our sales and results of operations.
Once our products are deployed within our end customers
networks, our customers depend on our support organization to
resolve any issues relating to our products. A high level of
support is critical for the successful marketing and sale of our
products. If we or our channel partners do not effectively
assist our end customers in deploying our products, succeed in
helping our end customers quickly resolve post-deployment
issues, or provide effective ongoing support, it would adversely
affect our ability to sell our products to existing customers
and could harm our reputation with potential customers. In
addition, as we expand our operations internationally, our
support organization will face additional challenges, including
those associated with delivering support, training and
documentation in languages other than English. As a result, our
failure, or the failure of our channel partners, to maintain
high quality support and services would have a material adverse
effect on our business, operating results and financial
condition.
23
Enterprises
are increasingly concerned with the security of their data, and
to the extent they elect to encrypt data between the end user
and the server, our products will become less
effective.
Our products depend on the ability to identify applications. Our
products currently do not identify applications if the data is
encrypted as it passes through our mobility controllers. Since
most organizations currently encrypt most of their data
transmissions only between sites and not on the LAN, the data is
not encrypted when it passes through our mobility controllers.
If more organizations elect to encrypt their data transmissions
from the end user to the server, our products will offer limited
benefits unless we have been successful in incorporating
additional functionality into our products that address those
encrypted transmissions. At the same time, if our products do
not provide the level of network security expected by our
customers, our reputation and brand would be damaged, and we
would expect to experience decreased sales. Our failure to
provide such additional functionality and expected level of
network security could adversely affect our business, operating
results and financial condition.
Our
products are highly technical and may contain undetected
hardware errors or software bugs, which could cause harm to our
reputation and adversely affect our business.
Our products are highly technical and complex and, when
deployed, are critical to the operation of many networks. Our
products have contained and may contain undetected errors, bugs
or security vulnerabilities. Some errors in our products may
only be discovered after a product has been installed and used
by customers. Any errors, bugs, defects or security
vulnerabilities discovered in our products after commercial
release could result in loss of revenues or delay in revenue
recognition, loss of customers, damage to our brand and
reputation, and increased service and warranty cost, any of
which could adversely affect our business, operating results and
financial condition. In addition, we could face claims for
product liability, tort or breach of warranty, including claims
relating to changes to our products made by our channel
partners. Our contracts with customers contain provisions
relating to warranty disclaimers and liability limitations,
which may not be upheld. Defending a lawsuit, regardless of its
merit, is costly and may divert managements attention and
adversely affect the markets perception of us and our
products. In addition, if our business liability insurance
coverage proves inadequate or future coverage is unavailable on
acceptable terms or at all, our business, operating results and
financial condition could be adversely impacted.
Our
use of open source software could impose limitations on our
ability to commercialize our products.
We incorporate open source software into our products. Although
we monitor our use of open source closely, the terms of many
open source licenses have not been interpreted by
U.S. courts, and there is a risk that such licenses could
be construed in a manner that could impose unanticipated
conditions or restrictions on our ability to commercialize our
products. We could also be subject to similar conditions or
restrictions should there be any changes in the licensing terms
of the open source software incorporated into our products. In
either event, we could be required to seek licenses from third
parties in order to continue offering our products, to
re-engineer our products or to discontinue the sale of our
products in the event re-engineering cannot be accomplished on a
timely basis, any of which could adversely affect our business,
operating results and financial condition.
We
rely on the availability of third-party licenses.
Many of our products are designed to include software or other
intellectual property licensed from third parties. It may be
necessary in the future to seek or renew licenses relating to
various aspects of these products. There can be no assurance
that the necessary licenses would be available on acceptable
terms, if at all. The inability to obtain certain licenses or
other rights or to obtain such licenses or rights on favorable
terms, or the need to engage in litigation regarding these
matters, could have a material adverse effect on our business,
operating results, and financial condition. Moreover, the
inclusion in our products of software or other intellectual
property licensed from third parties on a nonexclusive basis
could limit our ability to protect our proprietary rights in our
products.
24
Enterprises
may have slow WAN connections between some of their locations
that may cause our products to become less
effective.
Our mobility controllers and network management software were
initially designed to function at LAN-like speeds in an office
building or campus environment. In order to function
appropriately, our mobility controllers synchronize with each
other over network links. The ability of our products to
synchronize may be limited by slow or congested data-links,
including digital subscriber line (DSL) and
dial-up. Our
failure to provide such additional functionality could adversely
affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
New
regulations or changes in existing regulations related to our
products may result in unanticipated costs or liabilities, which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and future sales, and could place additional burdens
on the operations of our business.
Our products are subject to governmental regulations in a
variety of jurisdictions. If any of our products becomes subject
to new regulations or if any of our products becomes
specifically regulated by additional government entities,
compliance with such regulations could become more burdensome,
and there could be a material adverse effect on our business and
results of operations. For example, radio emissions are subject
to regulation in the United States and in other countries in
which we do business. In the United States, various federal
agencies including the Center for Devices and Radiological
Health of the Food and Drug Administration, the Federal
Communications Commission, the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration and various state agencies have promulgated
regulations that concern the use of radio/electromagnetic
emissions standards. Member countries of the European Union
(EU) have enacted similar standards concerning
electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility and
emissions standards.
If any of our products becomes subject to new regulations or if
any of our products becomes specifically regulated by additional
government entities, compliance with such regulations could
become more burdensome, and there could be a material adverse
effect on our business and our results of operations.
In addition, our wireless communication products operate through
the transmission of radio signals. Currently, operation of these
products in specified frequency bands does not require licensing
by regulatory authorities. Regulatory changes restricting the
use of frequency bands or allocating available frequencies could
become more burdensome and could have a material adverse effect
on our business, results of operations and future sales.
Compliance
with environmental matters and worker health and safety laws
could be costly, and noncompliance with these laws could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations, expenses
and financial condition.
Some of our operations use substances regulated under various
federal, state, local and international laws governing the
environment and worker health and safety, including those
governing the discharge of pollutants into the ground, air and
water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and
wastes, and the cleanup of contaminated sites. Some of our
products are subject to various federal, state, local and
international laws governing chemical substances in electronic
products. We could be subject to increased costs, fines, civil
or criminal sanctions, third-party property damage or personal
injury claims if we violate or become liable under environmental
and/or
worker health and safety laws.
We are
subject to governmental export and import controls that could
subject us to liability or impair our ability to compete in
international markets.
Because we incorporate encryption technology into our products,
our products are subject to U.S. export controls and may be
exported outside the United States only with the required level
of export license or through an export license exception. In
addition, various countries regulate the import of certain
encryption technology and radio frequency transmission equipment
and have enacted laws that could limit our ability to distribute
our products or could limit our customers ability to
implement our products in those countries. Changes in our
products or changes in export and import regulations may
increase the cost of building and selling our products, create
delays in the introduction of our products in international
markets, prevent our customers with international operations
from deploying our products throughout their global systems or,
in some cases, prevent the export or import of our
25
products to certain countries altogether. Any change in export
or import regulations or related legislation, shift in approach
to the enforcement or scope of existing regulations, or change
in the countries, persons or technologies targeted by such
regulations, could result in decreased use of our products by,
or in our decreased ability to export or sell our products to,
existing or potential customers with international operations.
Any decreased use of our products or limitation on our ability
to export or sell our products would harm our business,
operating results and financial condition.
Changes
in our tax rates could adversely affect our future
results.
We are a U.S. based multinational company subject to tax in
multiple U.S. and foreign tax jurisdictions. Unanticipated
changes in our tax rates could affect our future results of
operations. Our future effective tax rates, which are difficult
to predict, could be unfavorably affected by nondeductible
stock-based compensation, changes in the research and
development tax credit laws, earnings being lower than
anticipated in jurisdictions where we have lower statutory rates
and being higher than anticipated in jurisdictions where we have
higher statutory rates, transfer pricing adjustments, not
meeting the terms and conditions of tax holidays or incentives,
changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and
liabilities, changes in actual results versus our estimates, or
changes in tax laws, regulations, accounting principles or
interpretations thereof. Further, the accounting for stock
compensation expense in accordance with Accounting Standards
Codification Topic 718 Stock Compensation and uncertain
tax positions in accordance with Accounting Standards
Codification Topic 740 Income Taxes (ASC 740)
could result in more unpredictability and variability to our
future effective tax rates.
We are also subject to the periodic examination of our income
tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax
authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse
outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the
adequacy of our provision for income taxes. We may underestimate
the outcome of such examinations which, if significant, would
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and
financial condition.
If we
do not achieve increased tax benefits as a result of our
planned new corporate structure, our financial condition and
operating results could be adversely affected.
We intend to implement a new structure of our corporate
organization during fiscal year 2012 to more closely align our
corporate organization with the international nature of our
business activities and to reduce our overall effective tax rate
through changes in how we develop and use our intellectual
property and the structure of our international procurement and
sales, including by entering into transfer-pricing arrangements
that establish transfer prices for our intercompany
transactions. We anticipate achieving a reduction in our overall
effective tax rate in the future as a result. There can be no
assurance that the taxing authorities of the jurisdictions in
which we operate or to which we are otherwise deemed to have
sufficient tax nexus will not challenge the tax benefits that we
expect to realize as a result of the new structure. In addition,
future changes to U.S. or
non-U.S. tax
laws, including proposed legislation to reform
U.S. taxation of international business activities as
described above, would negatively impact the anticipated tax
benefits of the proposed new structure. Any benefits to our tax
rate will also depend on our ability to operate our business in
a manner consistent with the new structure of our corporate
organization and applicable taxing provisions, including by
eliminating the amount of cash distributed to us by our
subsidiaries. If the intended tax treatment is not accepted by
the applicable taxing authorities, changes in tax law negatively
impact the proposed structure or we do not operate our business
consistent with the new structure and applicable tax provisions,
we may fail to achieve the financial efficiencies that we
anticipate as a result of the new structure and our future
operating results and financial condition may be negatively
impacted.
We
incur significant costs as a result of operating as a public
company, and our management devotes substantial time to
compliance initiatives.
We incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses as a
public company, including costs resulting from regulations
regarding corporate governance practices and costs relating to
compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. For example, the listing
requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Markets Global Select
Market require that we satisfy certain corporate governance
requirements relating to independent directors, audit
committees, distribution of annual and interim reports,
stockholder meetings, stockholder approvals, solicitation of
proxies, conflicts of
26
interest, stockholder voting rights and codes of conduct. In
addition, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act contains various provisions applicable to the
corporate governance functions of public companies. Our
management and other personnel devote a substantial amount of
time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and
regulations have increased our legal and financial compliance
costs and will make some activities more time consuming and
costly. For example, these rules and regulations could make it
more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to
serve on our Board of Directors, our board committees or as
executive officers.
Our
business is subject to the risks of earthquakes, fire, floods
and other natural catastrophic events, and to interruption by
manmade problems such as computer viruses or
terrorism.
Our corporate headquarters are located in the San Francisco
Bay Area, a region known for seismic activity. A significant
natural disaster, such as an earthquake, fire or a flood,
occurring at our headquarters or in either China or Singapore,
where our major contract manufacturers are located, could have a
material adverse impact on our business, operating results and
financial condition. Our servers are vulnerable to computer
viruses, break-ins and similar disruptions from unauthorized
tampering with our computer systems. In addition, natural
disasters, acts of terrorism or war could cause disruptions in
our or our customers businesses or the economy as a whole.
We also rely on information technology systems to communicate
among our workforce and with third parties. Any disruption to
our communications, whether caused by a natural disaster or by
manmade problems, such as power disruptions, could adversely
affect our business. To the extent that any such disruptions
result in delays or cancellations of customer orders, or the
deployment of our products, our business, operating results and
financial condition would be adversely affected.
Risks
Related to Ownership of our Common Stock
Our
stock price may be volatile.
The trading price of our common stock has been and may continue
to be volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations in
response to various factors, some of which are beyond our
control. Factors that could affect the trading price of our
common stock could include:
|
|
|
| |
|
variations in our operating results;
|
| |
| |
|
announcements of technological innovations, new products or
product enhancements, strategic alliances or significant
agreements by us or by our competitors;
|
| |
| |
|
the gain or loss of significant customers;
|
| |
| |
|
recruitment or departure of key personnel;
|
| |
| |
|
the impact of unfavorable worldwide economic and market
conditions;
|
| |
| |
|
falling short of guidance on our financial results;
|
| |
| |
|
developments or disputes concerning our intellectual property or
other proprietary rights;
|
| |
| |
|
commencement of, or our involvement in, litigation;
|
| |
| |
|
announcements by or about us regarding events or news adverse to
our business;
|
| |
| |
|
the loss or bankruptcy of any of our major customers,
distribution partners or suppliers;
|
| |
| |
|
variations in the operating results of other publicly traded
corporations deemed by investors to be in our peer group;
|
| |
| |
|
an announced acquisition of or by a competitor, or an announced
acquisition of or by us;
|
| |
| |
|
rumors and market speculation involving us or other companies in
our industry;
|
27
|
|
|
| |
|
providing estimates of our future operating results, or changes
in these estimates, either by us or by any securities analysts
who follow our common stock, or changes in recommendations by
any securities analysts who follow our common stock;
|
| |
| |
|
significant sales, or announcement of significant sales, of our
common stock by us or our stockholders;
|
| |
| |
|
adoption or modification of regulations, policies, procedures or
programs applicable to our business; and
|
| |
| |
|
other events or factors, including those resulting from war,
incidents of terrorism or responses to these events.
|
In addition, the stock market in general, and the market for
technology companies in particular, has experienced extreme
price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or
disproportionate to the operating performance of those
companies. Broad market and industry factors may seriously
affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our
actual operating performance. In addition, in the past,
following periods of volatility in the overall market and the
market price of a particular companys securities,
securities class action litigation has often been instituted
against these companies. This litigation, if instituted against
us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our
managements attention and resources. All of these factors
could cause the market price of our common stock to decline, and
investors may lose some or all of the value of their investment.
If
securities or industry analysts do not publish research or
reports about our business, or if they issue an adverse or
misleading opinion regarding our stock, our stock price and
trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock will be influenced by
the research and reports that industry or securities analysts
publish about us or our business. If any of the analysts who
cover us issue an adverse or misleading opinion regarding our
stock, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of
these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to publish
reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the
financial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price or
trading volume to decline.
Insiders
have substantial control over us and will be able to influence
corporate matters.
As of July 31, 2011, our directors and executive officers
and their affiliates beneficially owned, in the aggregate,
approximately 9.5% of our outstanding common stock. As a result,
these stockholders will be able to exercise influence over
matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election
of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions,
such as a merger or other sale of our company or its assets.
This concentration of ownership could limit stockholders
ability to influence corporate matters and may have the effect
of delaying or preventing a third party from acquiring control
over us.
We may
choose to raise additional capital. Such capital may not be
available, or may be available on unfavorable terms, which may
dilute the ownership of our common stock.
If we choose to raise additional funds through public or private
debt or equity financings, due to unforeseen circumstances or
material expenditures, we cannot be certain that we will be able
to obtain additional financing on favorable terms, if at all,
and any additional financings could result in additional
dilution to our existing stockholders. In addition, capital
raised through debt financing may require us to make periodic
interest payments and may impose potentially restrictive
covenants on the conduct of our business.
Provisions
in our charter documents, Delaware law, employment arrangements
with certain of our executive officers, and our OEM supply
agreement with Alcatel-Lucent could discourage a takeover that
stockholders may consider favorable.
Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may
have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control or
changes in our management. These provisions include the
following:
|
|
|
| |
|
our board of directors has the right to elect directors to fill
a vacancy created by the expansion of the board of directors or
the resignation, death or removal of a director, which prevents
stockholders from being able to fill vacancies on our board of
directors;
|
28
|
|
|
| |
|
our stockholders may not act by written consent or call special
stockholders meetings; as a result, a holder, or holders,
controlling a majority of our capital stock would not be able to
take certain actions other than at annual stockholders
meetings or special stockholders meetings called by the
board of directors, the chairman of the board, the Chief
Executive Officer or the president;
|
| |
| |
|
our certificate of incorporation prohibits cumulative voting in
the election of directors, which limits the ability of minority
stockholders to elect director candidates;
|
| |
| |
|
stockholders must provide advance notice and additional
disclosures in order to nominate individuals for election to the
board of directors or to propose matters that can be acted upon
at a stockholders meeting, which may discourage or deter a
potential acquiror from conducting a solicitation of proxies to
elect the acquirors own slate of directors or otherwise
attempting to obtain control of our company; and
|
| |
| |
|
our board of directors may issue, without stockholder approval,
shares of undesignated preferred stock; the ability to issue
undesignated preferred stock makes it possible for our board of
directors to issue preferred stock with voting or other rights
or preferences that could impede the success of any attempt to
acquire us.
|
As a Delaware corporation, we are also subject to certain
Delaware anti-takeover provisions. Under Delaware law, a
corporation may not engage in a business combination with any
holder of 15% or more of its capital stock unless the holder has
held the stock for three years or, among other things, the board
of directors has approved the transaction. Our board of
directors could rely on Delaware law to prevent or delay an
acquisition of us.
Certain of our executive officers may be entitled to accelerated
vesting of their stock options pursuant to the terms of their
employment arrangements upon a change of control of Aruba. In
addition to the arrangements currently in place with some of our
executive officers, we may enter into similar arrangements in
the future with other officers. Such arrangements could delay or
discourage a potential acquisition of Aruba.
In addition, our OEM supply agreement with Alcatel-Lucent
provides that, in the event of a change of control that would
cause Alcatel-Lucent to purchase our products from an entity
that is an Alcatel-Lucent competitor, we must, without
additional consideration, (1) provide Alcatel-Lucent with
any information required by Alcatel-Lucent to make, test and
support the products that we distribute through our OEM
relationship with Alcatel-Lucent, including all hardware designs
and software source code, and (2) otherwise cooperate with
Alcatel-Lucent to transition the manufacturing, testing and
support of these products to Alcatel-Lucent. We are also
obligated to promptly inform Alcatel-Lucent if and when we
receive an inquiry concerning a bona fide proposal or offer to
effect a change of control and will not enter into negotiations
concerning a change of control without such prior notice to
Alcatel-Lucent. Each of these provisions could delay or result
in a discount to the proceeds our stockholders would otherwise
receive upon a change of control or could discourage a third
party from making a change of control offer.
We are
required to evaluate our internal control over financial
reporting under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and any adverse
results from such evaluation could result in a loss of investor
confidence in our financial reports and have an adverse effect
on our stock price.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires us to furnish a report by our
management on our internal control over financial reporting.
Such report contains, among other matters, an assessment of the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
as of the end of our fiscal year, including a statement as to
whether or not our internal control over financial reporting is
effective. This assessment must include disclosure of any
material weaknesses in our internal control over financial
reporting identified by management. While we were able to assert
in this report that our internal control over financial
reporting was effective as of July 31, 2011, we must
continue to monitor and assess our internal control over
financial reporting. If we are unable to assert in any future
reporting period that our internal control over financial
reporting is effective (or if our independent registered public
accounting firm is unable to express an opinion on the
effectiveness of our internal controls), we could lose investor
confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial
reports, which would have an adverse effect on our stock price.
|
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
Not applicable.
29
We have approximately 196,000 square feet of office space
in Sunnyvale, California pursuant to three leases that expire in
July 2016. We also lease approximately 40,000 square feet
of warehouse space in Sunnyvale, California pursuant to a lease
that expires in July 2016. We also maintain customer service
centers, sales offices and research and development facilities
in multiple locations worldwide. See Note 12 of our Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding
our lease obligations.
We believe that our current facilities are suitable and adequate
to meet our current needs and we intend to add new facilities or
expand existing facilities as necessary.
|
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
From time to time, we are involved in claims and legal
proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. We
expect that the number and significance of these matters will
increase as our business expands. Any claims or proceedings
against us, whether meritorious or not, could be time consuming,
result in costly litigation, require significant amounts of
management time, result in the diversion of significant
operational resources, or require us to enter into royalty or
licensing agreements which, if required, may not be available on
terms favorable to us or at all. If management believes that a
loss arising from these matters is probable and can be
reasonably estimated, we record the amount of the loss. As
additional information becomes available, any potential
liability related to these matters is assessed and the estimates
revised. Based on currently available information, management
does not believe that the ultimate outcomes of these unresolved
matters, individually and in the aggregate, are likely to have a
material adverse effect on our financial position, liquidity or
results of operations. However, litigation is subject to
inherent uncertainties, and our view of these matters may change
in the future. Were an unfavorable outcome to occur, there
exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on our
financial position and results of operations or liquidity for
the period in which the unfavorable outcome occurs or becomes
probable, and potentially in future periods.
30
|
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER REPURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Market
Information for Our Common Stock
Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market
under the symbol ARUN. The following table sets
forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices
for our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Select
Market.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
9.48
|
|
|
$
|
7.75
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
11.59
|
|
|
$
|
7.59
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
13.89
|
|
|
$
|
9.92
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
18.18
|
|
|
$
|
10.80
|
|
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
22.24
|
|
|
$
|
16.44
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
25.97
|
|
|
$
|
20.88
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
35.92
|
|
|
$
|
22.11
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
34.50
|
|
|
$
|
22.78
|
|
Holders
As of September 14, 2011, there were approximately 346
holders of record of our common stock. Because many of our
shares are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of
stockholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of
stockholders represented by these record holders.
31
Stock
Performance Graph
The following graph compares, for the period between
March 20, 2007 (the date of our initial public offering)
and July 31, 2011, the cumulative total stockholder return
for our common stock, the Nasdaq Composite Index and the Nasdaq
Computer Index. The graph assumes that $100 was invested on
March 27, 2007 in our common stock, the Nasdaq Composite
Index and the Nasdaq Computer Index and assumes reinvestment of
any dividends. The stock price performance on the following
graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price
performance. This performance graph shall not be deemed
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act), or incorporated by reference into any of our filings
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange
Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific
reference in such filing.
COMPARISON
OF 52 MONTH CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among Aruba Networks Inc, The NASDAQ Composite Index
And The NASDAQ Computer Index
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
$100 invested on 3/27/07 in stock or 2/28/07 in index, including
reinvestment of dividends.
Fiscal year ending July 31. |
Dividend
Policy
We have never declared or paid any cash dividend on our capital
stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings and do
not expect to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.
Repurchases
of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated
Purchasers
There were no repurchases of equity securities by us during
fiscal 2011.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
See Item 12 of Part III of this report regarding
information about securities authorized for issuance under our
equity compensation plans.
32
|
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
|
You should read the following selected consolidated historical
financial data below in conjunction with the section titled
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and the Consolidated
Financial Statements, related notes and schedule, and other
financial information included in this report. The selected
consolidated financial data in this section is not intended to
replace the Consolidated Financial Statements and is qualified
in its entirety by the Consolidated Financial Statements and
related notes and schedule included in this report. The
consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended
July 31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated balance sheet
data as of July 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 are derived from
audited consolidated financial statements, which are not
included in this report.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
334,860
|
|
|
$
|
221,474
|
|
|
$
|
161,927
|
|
|
$
|
148,550
|
|
|
$
|
107,939
|
|
|
Professional services and support
|
|
|
61,063
|
|
|
|
44,323
|
|
|
|
35,946
|
|
|
|
26,244
|
|
|
|
12,847
|
|
|
Ratable product and related professional services and support
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
|
|
3,466
|
|
|
|
6,713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
396,514
|
|
|
|
266,534
|
|
|
|
199,259
|
|
|
|
178,260
|
|
|
|
127,499
|
|
|
Cost of revenues(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
107,820
|
|
|
|
77,070
|
|
|
|
59,917
|
|
|
|
48,126
|
|
|
|
36,035
|
|
|
Professional services and support
|
|
|
14,873
|
|
|
|
8,775
|
|
|
|
7,437
|
|
|
|
7,761
|
|
|
|
4,863
|
|
|
Ratable product and related professional services and support
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
2,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
122,703
|
|
|
|
86,074
|
|
|
|
67,837
|
|
|
|
57,115
|
|
|
|
43,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
273,811
|
|
|
|
180,460
|
|
|
|
131,422
|
|
|
|
121,145
|
|
|
|
84,131
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development(1)
|
|
|
84,890
|
|
|
|
51,619
|
|
|
|
40,293
|
|
|
|
37,393
|
|
|
|
25,654
|
|
|
Sales and marketing(1)
|
|
|
154,239
|
|
|
|
109,393
|
|
|
|
90,241
|
|
|
|
86,008
|
|
|
|
60,115
|
|
|
General and administrative(1)
|
|
|
39,431
|
|
|
|
30,953
|
|
|
|
23,198
|
|
|
|
17,740
|
|
|
|
14,600
|
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
Acquisition related severance expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Litigation reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
278,560
|
|
|
|
213,865
|
|
|
|
155,179
|
|
|
|
141,338
|
|
|
|
101,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(4,749
|
)
|
|
|
(33,405
|
)
|
|
|
(23,757
|
)
|
|
|
(20,193
|
)
|
|
|
(16,870
|
)
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
3,802
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
1,132
|
|
|
|
4,036
|
|
|
|
(7,137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
(947
|
)
|
|
|
(33,270
|
)
|
|
|
(22,625
|
)
|
|
|
(16,157
|
)
|
|
|
(24,007
|
)
|
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
(71,635
|
)
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
70,688
|
|
|
$
|
(33,998
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,413
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,124
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,382
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per
common basic
|
|
|
100,299
|
|
|
|
89,978
|
|
|
|
84,612
|
|
|
|
79,467
|
|
|
|
34,808
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share basic
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.70
|
)
|
|
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per
common diluted
|
|
|
117,117
|
|
|
|
89,978
|
|
|
|
84,612
|
|
|
|
79,467
|
|
|
|
34,808
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share diluted
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.70
|
)
|
33
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes stock-based compensation as follows: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
3,464
|
|
|
$
|
1,397
|
|
|
$
|
1,018
|
|
|
$
|
704
|
|
|
$
|
327
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
23,026
|
|
|
|
10,716
|
|
|
|
7,577
|
|
|
|
6,200
|
|
|
|
2,925
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
24,399
|
|
|
|
14,205
|
|
|
|
10,520
|
|
|
|
8,953
|
|
|
|
4,362
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
$
|
12,862
|
|
|
$
|
9,763
|
|
|
$
|
5,464
|
|
|
$
|
3,421
|
|
|
$
|
5,103
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
80,773
|
|
|
$
|
31,254
|
|
|
$
|
41,298
|
|
|
$
|
37,602
|
|
|
$
|
42,570
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
153,185
|
|
|
|
124,167
|
|
|
|
81,839
|
|
|
|
64,130
|
|
|
|
62,430
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
269,900
|
|
|
|
133,927
|
|
|
|
115,639
|
|
|
|
103,097
|
|
|
|
109,496
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
488,871
|
|
|
|
250,707
|
|
|
|
203,054
|
|
|
|
188,801
|
|
|
|
152,133
|
|
|
Common stock and additional
paid-in-capital
|
|
|
450,157
|
|
|
|
326,187
|
|
|
|
279,035
|
|
|
|
249,139
|
|
|
|
213,553
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
345,342
|
|
|
$
|
150,655
|
|
|
$
|
137,585
|
|
|
$
|
130,875
|
|
|
$
|
112,487
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition
and results of operations should be read together with our
Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this report.
Overview
We are a global leader in distributed enterprise networks that
securely connect local and remote users to corporate IT
resources. Our award-winning portfolio of campus, branch office,
teleworker, and mobile solutions simplify operations and provide
secure access to all corporate applications and
services regardless of a users device,
location, or network. The result is improved productivity and
lower capital and operating costs.
Our product portfolio encompasses: industry-leading high-speed
802.11a/b/g/n WLANs, Virtual Branching Networking solutions for
branch offices and teleworkers, network operations tools,
including spectrum analyzers, wireless intrusion prevention
systems, and the AirWave Wireless Management Suite for managing
wired, wireless, and mobile device networks. During the third
quarter of fiscal 2011, we introduced our new MOVE architecture.
Our MOVE architecture integrates wireless, wired and remote
silos into one cohesive access solution enabled by cloud based
mobility services. Access privileges are context aware, meaning
they are based on user, device, application and location, and
this dictates the type of network resources each person is
entitled to access. These products are key to our network
rightsizing initiative which allows companies to move toward a
low-cost IT infrastructure solution by funding wireless projects
rather than wired LANs.
Our products have been sold to over 15,500 end customers
worldwide (not including customers of Alcatel-Lucent), including
some of the largest and most complex global organizations. We
have implemented a two-tier distribution model in most areas of
the world, including the United States, with VADs selling our
portfolio of products, including a variety of our support
services, to a diverse number of VARs. Our focus continues to be
management of our channel including selection and growth of high
prospect partners, activation of our VARs and VADs through
active training and field collaboration, and evolution of our
channel programs in consultation with our partners.
34
Major
Trends Affecting Our Financial Results
Worldwide
Economic Conditions
Our business depends on the overall demand for IT and on the
economic health and general willingness of our current and
prospective customers to make capital commitments. If the
conditions in the U.S. and global economic environment
remain uncertain or continue to be volatile, or if they
deteriorate further, our business, operating results, and
financial condition may be materially adversely affected.
Economic weakness, customer financial difficulties and
constrained spending on IT initiatives have resulted, and may in
the future result, in challenging and delayed sales cycles and
could negatively impact our ability to forecast future periods.
In particular, we cannot be assured of the level of IT spending,
the deterioration of which could have a material adverse effect
on our results of operations and growth rates.
Revenues
Our ability to increase our product revenues will depend
significantly on continued growth in the market for enterprise
mobility and remote networking solutions, continued acceptance
of our products in the marketplace, our ability to continue to
attract new customers, our ability to compete, the willingness
of customers to displace wired networks with wireless LANs, in
particular, wireless LANs that utilize our 802.11n solution, and
our ability to continue to sell into our installed base of
existing customers. Our growth in support revenues is dependent
upon increasing the number of products under support contracts,
which is dependent on both growing our installed base of
customers and renewing existing support contracts. Our future
profitability and rate of growth, if any, will also be directly
affected by the timing and size of orders, product and channel
mix, average selling prices, costs of our products, our ability
to effectively implement and generate incremental business from
our two-tier distribution model, general economic conditions,
and the extent to which we invest in our sales and marketing,
research and development, and general and administrative
resources.
The revenue growth that we have experienced has been driven
primarily by an expansion of our customer base coupled with
increased purchases from existing customers. We believe the
growth we have experienced is the result of business enterprises
needing to provide secure mobility to their users in a manner
that we believe is more cost effective than the traditional
approach of using port-centric networks. While we have
experienced both longer sales cycles and seasonality, both of
which have slowed our revenue growth, we believe that our
product offerings, in particular our products that incorporate
802.11n wireless LAN standard technologies, will enable broader
networking initiatives by both our current and potential
customers in the future. Each quarter, our ability to meet our
product revenue expectations is dependent upon (1) new
orders received, shipped, and recognized in a given quarter,
(2) the amount of orders booked but not shipped in the
prior quarter that are shipped in the current quarter, and
(3) the amount of deferred revenue entering a given
quarter. Our product deferred revenue is comprised of:
|
|
|
| |
|
product orders that have shipped but where the terms of the
agreement, typically with our large customers, contain
acceptance terms and conditions or other terms that require that
the revenue be deferred until all revenue recognition criteria
are met; and
|
| |
| |
|
product orders shipped to our VADs and OEMs for which we have
not yet received persuasive evidence from the VADs or OEMs of a
sale to an end customer.
|
We typically ship products within a reasonable time period after
the receipt of an order.
Costs
and Expenses
Operating expenses consist of research and development, sales
and marketing, and general and administrative expenses. The
largest component of our operating expenses is personnel costs.
Personnel costs consist of salaries, benefits and incentive
compensation for our employees, including commissions for sales
personnel and stock-based compensation for all employees.
Personnel-related costs are the most significant component of
each these categories. Our total headcount increased to 1,057 at
July 31, 2011 from 1,009 at April 30, 2011, 924 at
January 31, 2011, 868 at October 31, 2010 and 681 at
July 31, 2010. The increase in employees is the most
significant driver behind the increase in costs and operating
expenses in fiscal 2011. Going forward, we expect to continue to
hire employees throughout the company.
35
Acquisitions
On November 19, 2010, we entered into an agreement with
Amigopod, pursuant to which we acquired substantially all of its
assets. The acquisition was completed on December 3, 2010.
The total consideration was $3.0 million and resulted in
additional goodwill of $0.6 million.
On September 2, 2010, we completed our acquisition of
Azalea Networks for a total purchase price of $42.0 million
which included common stock, cash, and contingent rights. Azalea
is a leading supplier of outdoor mesh networks and includes an
operations center in Beijing, China that will complement our
existing research and development centers. As part of the
acquisition, we recorded $5.5 million of tangible assets,
$17.0 million of intangible assets and $24.8 million
of goodwill. We recorded a liability for the estimated fair
value of the contingent rights which was based on significant
inputs not observed in the market and thus represents a
Level 3 instrument. Level 3 instruments are valued
based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no
market activity and reflect our own assumptions in measuring
fair value. Gains and losses on the remeasurement of the
liability are included in other income (expense), net. See
Note 2 to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Revenues,
Cost of Revenues and Operating Expenses
Revenues
We derive our revenues from sales of our ArubaOS operating
system, controllers, wired and wireless access points, switches,
application software modules, multi-vendor management solution
software, and professional services and support. Professional
services revenues consist of consulting and training services.
Consulting services primarily consist of installation support
services. Training services are instructor led courses on the
use of our products. Support services typically consist of
software updates, on a
when-and-if
available basis, telephone and internet access to technical
support personnel and hardware support. We provide customers
with rights to unspecified software product upgrades and to
maintenance releases and patches released during the term of the
support period.
We sell our products directly through our sales force and
indirectly through VADs, VARs, and OEMs. We expect revenues from
indirect channels to continue to constitute a significant
majority of our future revenues.
We sell our products to channel partners and end customers
located in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and
Asia Pacific. We continue to expand into international locations
and introduce our products in new markets, and we expect
international revenues to increase in absolute dollars and
remain consistent or increase as a percentage of total revenues
in fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011. For more information
about our international revenues, see Note 11 of the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Cost
of Revenues
Cost of product revenues consists primarily of manufacturing
costs for our products, shipping and logistics costs, and
expenses for inventory obsolescence and warranty obligations. We
utilize third parties to manufacture our products and perform
shipping logistics. We have outsourced the substantial majority
of our manufacturing, repair and supply chain operations.
Accordingly, the substantial majority of our cost of revenues
consists of payments to our contract manufacturers. Our
contractor manufacturers produce our products in China and
Singapore using quality assurance programs and standards that we
jointly established. Manufacturing, engineering and
documentation controls are conducted at our facilities in
Sunnyvale, California, Bangalore, India and Beijing, China. Cost
of product revenues also includes amortization expense from our
purchased intangible assets.
Cost of professional services and support revenues is primarily
comprised of personnel costs, including stock-based
compensation, of providing technical support, including
personnel costs associated with our internal support
organization. In addition, we engage a third-party support
vendor to complement our internal support resources, the costs
of which are included within costs of professional services and
support revenues.
36
Gross
Margin
Our gross margin has been, and will continue to be, affected by
a variety of factors, including:
|
|
|
| |
|
the proportion of our products that are sold through direct
versus indirect channels;
|
| |
| |
|
product mix and average selling prices;
|
| |
| |
|
new product introductions, such as our MOVE architecture and our
outdoor mesh network products, and product enhancements made by
us as well as those made by our competitors;
|
| |
| |
|
pressure to discount our products in response to our
competitors discounting practices;
|
| |
| |
|
mix of revenue attributed to our international regions;
|
| |
| |
|
demand for our products and services;
|
| |
| |
|
our ability to attain volume manufacturing pricing from our
contract manufacturers and our component suppliers;
|
| |
| |
|
losses associated with excess and obsolete inventory;
|
| |
| |
|
growth in our headcount and other related costs incurred in our
customer support organization;
|
| |
| |
|
costs associated with manufacturing overhead;
|
| |
| |
|
our ability to manage freight costs; and
|
| |
| |
|
amortization expense from our purchased intangible assets.
|
Due to higher net effective discounts for products sold through
our indirect channel, our overall gross margins for indirect
channel sales are typically lower than those associated with
direct sales. We expect product revenues from our indirect
channel to continue to constitute a significant majority of our
total revenues, which, by itself, negatively impacts our gross
margins. Further, we expect that within our indirect channel,
sales through our VADs and OEMs will continue to be significant,
which will negatively impact our gross margins as VADs and OEMs
experience a larger net effective discount than our other
channel partners.
Research
and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses primarily consist of personnel
costs and facilities costs. We expense research and development
expenses as incurred. We are devoting substantial resources to
the continued development of additional functionality for
existing products and the development of new products. We intend
to continue to invest significantly in our research and
development efforts because we believe it is essential to
maintaining our competitive position. For fiscal 2012, we expect
research and development expenses to increase on an absolute
dollar basis and decrease as a percentage of revenue compared to
fiscal 2011.
Sales
and Marketing Expenses
Sales and marketing expenses represent the largest component of
our operating expenses and primarily consist of personnel costs,
sales commissions, marketing programs and facilities costs.
Amortization expense related to our purchased intangible assets
is also included in sales and marketing expenses. Marketing
programs are intended to generate revenue from new and existing
customers and are expensed as incurred. We plan to continue to
invest strategically in sales and marketing with the intent to
add new customers and increase penetration within our existing
customer base, expand our domestic and international sales and
marketing activities, build brand awareness and sponsor
additional marketing events. We expect future sales and
marketing expenses to continue to be our most significant
operating expense. Generally, sales personnel are not
immediately productive, and thus, the increase in sales and
marketing expenses that we experience as we hire additional
sales personnel is not expected to immediately result in
increased revenues. As a result, these expenses will reduce our
operating margins until such sales personnel become productive
and generate revenue. Accordingly, the timing of sales personnel
hiring and the rate at which they become productive will affect
our future performance. For fiscal 2012, we expect sales and
37
marketing expenses to increase on an absolute dollar basis and
decrease as a percentage of revenue compared to fiscal 2011.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses primarily consist of
personnel and facilities costs related to our executive,
finance, human resource, information technology and legal
organizations, as well as insurance, investor relations, and IT
infrastructure costs related to our enterprise resource planning
(ERP) system. Further, our general and
administrative expenses include professional services consisting
of outside legal, audit, Sarbanes-Oxley and IT consulting costs.
We have incurred in the past, and may continue to incur,
significant legal costs defending ourselves against claims made
by third parties. These expenses are expected to continue as
part of our ongoing operations and depending on the timing and
outcome of lawsuits and the legal process, could have a
significant impact on our financial statements. For fiscal 2012,
we expect general and administrative expenses to increase on an
absolute dollar basis and decrease as a percentage of revenue
compared to fiscal 2011.
Other
Income (Expense), net
Other income (expense), net includes interest income on cash
balances, accretion of discount or amortization of premium on
short-term investments, losses or gains on remeasurement of
non-U.S. dollar
transactions into U.S. dollars, and in connection with our
acquisition of Azalea in September 2010, changes in the fair
value of our contingent rights liability.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP). These accounting principles require us to
make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities as of the date of the Consolidated
Financial Statements, as well as the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the periods presented. We believe
that the estimates and judgments upon which we rely are
reasonable based upon information available to us at the time
that these estimates and judgments are made. To the extent there
are material differences between these estimates and actual
results, our Consolidated Financial Statements will be affected.
The accounting policies that reflect our more significant
estimates and judgments and which we believe are the most
critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our
reported financial results include revenue recognition,
stock-based compensation, inventory valuation, allowances for
doubtful accounts, income taxes, and goodwill and purchased
intangible assets.
Revenue
Recognition and Sales Returns
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) amended the accounting standards for revenue
recognition to remove tangible products containing software
components and non-software components that function together to
deliver the products essential functionality from the
scope of industry-specific software revenue recognition
guidance. In October 2009, the FASB also amended the accounting
standards for multiple-element revenue arrangements to:
(i) provide updated guidance on how the elements in a
multiple-element arrangement should be separated, and how the
consideration should be allocated;
(ii) require an entity to allocate revenue amongst the elements
in an arrangement using estimated selling price if a vendor does
not have vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE)
of the selling price or third-party evidence of the selling
price; and
(iii) eliminate the use of the residual method and require an
entity to allocate revenue using the relative selling price
method.
We adopted this accounting guidance at the beginning of our
first quarter of fiscal 2011 on a prospective basis for
applicable arrangements originating or materially modified after
July 31, 2010. The impact of this adoption was not material
to our financial position and results of operations for fiscal
2011.
38
This guidance does not generally change the units of accounting
for our revenue transactions. Most non-software products and
services qualify as separate units of accounting because they
have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis and our
revenue arrangements generally do not include a general right of
return relative to delivered products.
The majority of our products are hardware appliances containing
software components that function together to provide the
essential functionality of the product. Therefore, our hardware
appliances are considered non-software elements and are not
subject to the industry-specific software revenue recognition
guidance.
Our product revenue also includes revenue from the sale of
stand-alone software products. Stand-alone software products may
operate on our hardware appliance but are not considered
essential to the functionality of the hardware. Sales of
stand-alone software generally include a perpetual license to
our software. Sales of stand-alone software continue to be
subject to the industry-specific software revenue recognition
guidance.
For all arrangements originating or materially modified after
July 31, 2010, we recognize revenue in accordance with the
amended accounting guidance. Certain arrangements with
multiple-elements may continue to have stand-alone software
elements that are subject to the existing software revenue
recognition guidance along with non-software elements that are
subject to the amended revenue accounting guidance. The revenue
for these multiple deliverable arrangements is allocated to the
stand-alone software elements as a group and the non-software
elements based on the relative selling prices of all of the
elements in the arrangement using the fair value hierarchy in
the amended revenue accounting guidance.
For sales of stand-alone software after July 31, 2010 and
for all transactions entered into prior to the first quarter of
2011, we recognize revenue based on software revenue recognition
guidance. Under the software revenue recognition guidance, we
use the residual method to recognize revenue when a product
agreement includes one or more elements to be delivered at a
future date and VSOE of the fair value of all undelivered
elements exists. In the majority of our contracts, the only
element that remains undelivered at the time of delivery of the
product is support services. Under the residual method, the fair
value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining
portion of the contract fee is recognized as product revenue. If
evidence of the fair value of one or more undelivered elements
does not exist, all revenue is generally deferred and recognized
when delivery of those elements occurs or when fair value can be
established. When the undelivered element for which we do not
have VSOE of fair value is support, revenue for the entire
arrangement is bundled and recognized ratably over the support
period.
VSOE for elements of an arrangement is based upon the normal
pricing and discounting practices for those services when sold
separately, and VSOE for support services is measured by the
stand-alone renewal rate offered to the customer. In determining
VSOE, we require that a substantial majority of the selling
prices for an element falls within a reasonably narrow pricing
range, generally evidenced by a substantial majority of such
historical stand-alone transactions falling within a reasonably
narrow range of the median rates. In addition, we consider major
service groups, geographies, customer classifications, and other
variables in determining VSOE.
We are typically not able to determine third-party evidence
(TPE) for our products or services. TPE is
determined based on competitor prices for similar elements when
sold separately. Generally, our
go-to-market
strategy differs from that of our peers and our offerings
contain a significant level of differentiation such that the
comparable pricing of products with similar functionality cannot
be obtained. Furthermore, we are unable to reliably determine
what similar competitor products selling prices are on a
stand-alone basis.
When we are unable to establish selling price of our
non-software elements using VSOE or TPE, we use estimated
selling price (ESP) in our allocation of arrangement
consideration. The objective of ESP is to determine the price at
which we would transact a sale if the product or service were
sold on a stand-alone basis. We determine ESP for a product or
service by considering multiple factors including, but not
limited to, cost of products, gross margin objectives, pricing
practices, geographies, customer classes and distribution
channels.
We regularly review VSOE and ESP and maintain internal controls
over the establishment and updates of these estimates. There was
not a material impact during fiscal 2011, nor do we currently
expect a material impact in the near term from changes in VSOE
or ESP.
39
Product revenue consists of revenue from sales of our hardware
appliances and perpetual software licenses. We recognize product
revenue when all of the following have occurred: (1) we
have entered into a legally binding arrangement with a customer;
(2) delivery has occurred; (3) customer payment is
deemed fixed or determinable and free of contingencies and
significant uncertainties; and (4) collection is reasonably
assured.
For sales to direct end-users and channel partners, including
VARs, VADs, and OEMs, we recognize product revenue upon
delivery, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are
met. For our hardware appliances, delivery occurs upon transfer
of title and risk of loss, which is generally upon shipment. It
is our practice to identify an end-user prior to shipment to a
channel partner. For end-users and channel partners, we
generally have no significant obligations for future performance
such as rights of return or pricing credits. A portion of our
sales are made through distributors under agreements allowing
for stocking of our products in their inventory, pricing credits
and limited rights of return for stock rotation. Product revenue
on sales made through these distributors is initially deferred
and revenue is recognized upon sell-through as reported by the
distributors to us. Shipping charges billed to customers are
included in product revenue and the related shipping costs are
included in cost of product revenue. The amount of inventory
held by resellers pending a sale to an end customer was
$2.0 million and $3.7 million as of July 31, 2011
and 2010.
Support and services offerings consist of support agreements,
professional services, and training. Support services include
repair and replacement of defective hardware appliances,
software updates and access to technical support personnel.
Software updates provide customers with rights to unspecified
software product upgrades and to maintenance releases and
patches released during the term of the support period. Revenue
for support services is recognized on a straight-line basis over
the service contract term, which is typically one to five years.
Revenue for professional services is recognized upon delivery or
completion of performance. Professional service arrangements are
typically short term in nature and are largely completed within
90 days from the start of service. Revenue for training
services is recognized upon delivery of the training.
The related sale of support services to a reseller occurs when a
specific sale to an end customer occurs. If the sale of support
services occurs at the same time as we receive the initial
purchase order from the reseller, the support services are
included on that purchase order and the related revenue is
recognized ratably over the related support period, commencing
on the date of delivery to the end customer. If the sale of
support services occurs after we receive the initial purchase
order, the support services for the specific product sales are
purchased on a subsequent purchase order. The subsequent
purchase order is received at the time the
point-of-sale
(POS) report is provided for all product sales that
occurred during the month. Revenue for support services is
recognized ratably over the related support period, commencing
from the delivery date to each respective end customer.
Post-contractual support (PCS) services that we
provide to our channel partners differ from PCS that we provide
to our end customers in that we are only obligated to provide
support services to the channel partner directly, while the
channel partner is obligated to provide support services
directly to the end customer. The channel partner is obligated
to provide Level 1 and Level 2 support services to the
end customer, including technical support and return merchandise
authorization (RMA) fulfillment, while our
obligations are only to provide software upgrades and
Level 3 technical support in the unusual scenario in which
the channel partner is unable to provide the technical support
that the end customer requires.
Our fees are typically considered to be fixed or determinable at
the inception of an arrangement, generally based on specific
products and quantities to be delivered. Substantially all of
our contracts do not include rights of return or acceptance
provisions. To the extent that our agreements contain such
terms, we recognize revenue once the customer has accepted or
once the acceptance provisions or right of return lapses.
Payment terms to customers generally range from net 30 to
60 days. In the event payment terms are provided that
differ from our standard business practices, the fees are deemed
to not be fixed or determinable and revenue is recognized when
the payments become due, provided the remaining criteria for
revenue recognition have been met.
We assess the ability to collect from our customers based on a
number of factors, including credit worthiness of the customer
and past transaction history of the customer. If the customer is
not deemed credit worthy, we defer revenue from the arrangement
until payment is received and all other revenue recognition
criteria have been met. We record estimated sales returns as a
reduction to revenues upon shipment based on our contractual
obligations and
40
historical returns experience. In cases where we are aware of
circumstances that will likely result in a specific
customers request to return purchased equipment, we record
a specific sales returns reserve.
Stock-Based
Compensation
We measure and recognize compensation expense for all
share-based payment awards made to employees and non-employees
based on estimated fair values. Our share-based payment awards
include stock options, restricted stock units and awards,
employee stock purchase plan awards and performance-based
awards, which require an assessment of the probability of
vesting. We calculate the fair value of restricted stock based
on the fair market value on the date of grant. We calculate the
fair value of stock options and employee stock purchase plans on
the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing method.
This methodology requires the use of subjective assumptions,
including expected stock price volatility over the term of the
awards, actual and projected employee stock option exercise
behaviors, risk-free interest rates and expected dividends. This
fair value is then amortized on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service periods of the awards, which is generally the
vesting period. We determine the amount of stock-based
compensation expense based on awards that we ultimately expect
to vest, reduced for estimated forfeitures. In addition,
compensation expense includes the effects of awards modified,
repurchased or cancelled.
Goodwill
and Intangibles
We perform an annual goodwill impairment test. For purposes of
impairment testing, we have determined that we have only one
reporting unit. The identification and measurement of goodwill
impairment involves the estimation of the fair value of the
Company. These estimates of fair value are based on the best
information available as of the date of the assessment, which
primarily includes our market capitalization. As of the date of
the assessment, our market capitalization was substantially in
excess of our carrying value. As a result, we did not recognize
impairment charges in any of the periods presented.
Purchased intangible assets with finite lives are amortized
using the straight-line method over the estimated economic lives
of the assets, which range from one to seven years. Amortization
expense is recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations
in cost of revenues and sales and marketing expenses. Long-lived
assets, including intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Some
factors we consider important which could trigger an impairment
review include the following:
|
|
|
| |
|
significant underperformance relative to estimated results;
|
| |
| |
|
significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired
assets or the strategy for our overall business; and
|
| |
| |
|
significant negative industry or economic trends.
|
Determination of recoverability of purchased intangible assets
is based on an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows
resulting from the use of the asset and its eventual
disposition. Measurement of an impairment loss is based on the
fair value of the asset. We did not recognize impairment charges
in any of the periods presented.
Screening for and assessing whether impairment indicators exist
or if events or changes in circumstances have occurred,
including market conditions, operating fundamentals, competition
and general economic conditions, requires significant judgment.
Additionally, changes in the technology industry occur
frequently and quickly. Therefore, there can be no assurance
that a charge to operating expenses will not occur as a result
of future goodwill and purchased intangible impairment tests.
Inventory
Valuation
Inventory consists of hardware and related component parts and
is stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is computed using
the standard cost, which approximates actual cost, on a
first-in,
first-out basis. We record inventory write-downs for potentially
excess inventory based on forecasted demand, economic trends,
technological obsolescence of our products and transition of
inventory related to new product releases. If future demand or
market
41
conditions are less favorable than our projections, additional
inventory write-downs could be required and would be reflected
in cost of product revenues in the period the revision is made.
At the point of the loss recognition, a new, lower-cost basis
for that inventory is established, and subsequent changes in
facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or
increase in that newly established cost basis. Inventory
write-downs amounted to $2.6 million, $2.9 million,
and $3.4 million, for fiscal years 2011, 2010, and 2009,
respectively.
Allowances
for Doubtful Accounts
We record a provision for doubtful accounts based on historical
experience and a detailed assessment of the collectibility of
our accounts receivable. In estimating the allowance for
doubtful accounts, our management considers, among other
factors, (1) the aging of the accounts receivable,
including trends within and ratios involving the age of the
accounts receivable, (2) our historical write-offs,
(3) the credit-worthiness of each customer, (4) the
economic conditions of the customers industry, and
(5) general economic conditions, especially given the
recent financial crisis in todays economic environment. In
cases where we are aware of circumstances that may impair a
specific customers ability to meet their financial
obligations to us, we record a specific allowance against
amounts due from the customer, and thereby reduce the net
recognized receivable to the amount we reasonably believe will
be collected. The allowance for doubtful accounts was
$0.3 million and $0.5 million at July 31, 2011
and 2010, respectively.
Income
Taxes
We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income
taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the estimated future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the Consolidated Financial Statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets are recognized for
deductible temporary differences, along with net operating loss
carryforwards, if it is more likely than not that the tax
benefits will be realized. The ultimate realization of the
deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future
taxable income during the periods in which those temporary
differences, research and credit carryforwards and net operating
loss carryforwards are deductible. To the extent deferred tax
assets cannot be recognized under the preceding criteria, a
valuation allowance is established.
As a result of our increasing profitability in fiscal 2011,
expectations for continued profits going forward, and expected
material taxable income generated from intercompany payments
resulting from our offshore tax restructuring to be implemented
during fiscal year 2012, we determined that it is more likely
than not that future profitability will be sufficient to realize
deferred income tax assets. In accordance with ASC 740 and
related literature, we released a majority of our valuation
allowances against our deferred income tax assets during the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. We continue to maintain
$0.2 million valuation allowance against a portion of our
foreign net operating loss deferred tax assets. Net income for
fiscal 2011 includes a discrete tax benefit of
$72.8 million which was largely attributed to the release
of our valuation allowances and the recording of the associated
net deferred tax assets on our balance sheet.
Income tax contingencies are accounted for and may require
significant management judgment in estimating final outcomes.
Actual results could differ materially from these estimates and
could significantly affect the effective tax rate and cash flows
in future years. As of July 31, 2011 and 2010, we had
$10.9 million and $6.3 million, respectively, of
unrecognized tax benefits, which if recognized would affect our
income tax expense.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
for recent accounting pronouncements that could have an effect
on us.
42
Results
of Operations
The following table presents our historical operating results as
a percentage of revenues for the periods indicated:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
84.5
|
%
|
|
|
83.1
|
%
|
|
|
81.3
|
%
|
|
Professional services and support
|
|
|
15.4
|
%
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
|
|
18.0
|
%
|
|
Ratable product and related professional services and support
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
28.9
|
%
|
|
|
30.1
|
%
|
|
Professional services and support
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
Ratable product and related professional services and support
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
69.1
|
%
|
|
|
67.7
|
%
|
|
|
66.0
|
%
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
21.4
|
%
|
|
|
19.4
|
%
|
|
|
20.3
|
%
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
38.9
|
%
|
|
|
41.0
|
%
|
|
|
45.3
|
%
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
11.6
|
%
|
|
|
11.6
|
%
|
|
Restructuring expenses
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
Litigation reserves
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
70.3
|
%
|
|
|
80.2
|
%
|
|
|
77.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(11.9
|
)%
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(11.4
|
)%
|
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
(18.1
|
)%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
|
(12.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
Revenues
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
396,514
|
|
|
$
|
266,534
|
|
|
$
|
199,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
334,860
|
|
|
$
|
221,474
|
|
|
$
|
161,927
|
|
|
Professional services and support
|
|
|
61,063
|
|
|
|
44,323
|
|
|
|
35,946
|
|
|
Ratable product and related professional services and support
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
396,514
|
|
|
$
|
266,534
|
|
|
$
|
199,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% revenues by type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
84.5
|
%
|
|
|
83.1
|
%
|
|
|
81.3
|
%
|
|
Professional services and support
|
|
|
15.4
|
%
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
|
|
18.0
|
%
|
|
Ratable product and related professional services and support
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
Revenues by geography:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
250,995
|
|
|
$
|
166,584
|
|
|
$
|
129,991
|
|
|
Europe, the Middle East and Africa
|
|
|
62,595
|
|
|
|
38,140
|
|
|
|
34,178
|
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
70,171
|
|
|
|
51,110
|
|
|
|
27,023
|
|
|
Rest of World
|
|
|
12,753
|
|
|
|
10,700
|
|
|
|
8,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
396,514
|
|
|
$
|
266,534
|
|
|
$
|
199,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% revenues by geography:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
63.3
|
%
|
|
|
62.5
|
%
|
|
|
65.2
|
%
|
|
Europe, the Middle East and Africa
|
|
|
15.8
|
%
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
|
|
17.2
|
%
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
|
|
19.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
Rest of World
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
Total revenues by sales channel:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect
|
|
$
|
368,945
|
|
|
$
|
246,344
|
|
|
$
|
168,512
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
|
27,569
|
|
|
|
20,190
|
|
|
|
30,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
396,514
|
|
|
$
|
266,534
|
|
|
$
|
199,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% revenues by sales channel:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect
|
|
|
93.0
|
%
|
|
|
92.4
|
%
|
|
|
84.6
|
%
|
|
Direct
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
15.4
|
%
|
During fiscal 2011, total revenues increased
$130.0 million, or 48.8%, over fiscal 2010. The increase in
fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010 was attributable to
broad-based demand across all of our major geographies and
verticals, and the significant growth in our customer base. We
added nearly 5,000 new customers during fiscal 2011. Our network
rightsizing and MOVE architecture initiatives continues to gain
momentum as companies move toward a new access network. The
rapid proliferation of Wi-Fi enabled mobile devices, the
increase in demand for multimedia-rich mobility applications,
and the rise of both server and desktop virtualization is
driving this trend.
Product revenues increased 51.2% during fiscal 2011 compared to
fiscal 2010. Our product revenues were bolstered by an increase
in revenue related to our 802.11n access points with new
customers almost exclusively choosing to roll out 802.11n
networks. The increase in professional services and support
revenues is a result of both increased product and first year
support sales, and the renewal of support contracts by existing
customers as our customer base continues to grow.
44
Ratable product and related professional services and support
revenues decreased in fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010 due to
the run-off in the amortization of deferred revenue associated
with those customer contracts that we entered into prior to our
establishment of VSOE of fair value. The current balance of
ratable deferred revenue, and subsequent ratable revenue,
relates entirely to our acquisition of Azalea. We expect ratable
product and related professional services and support revenues
to continue to decrease in absolute dollars and as a percentage
of total revenues in future periods.
Revenues from our indirect sales channel increased during fiscal
2011 compared to fiscal 2010 and increased slightly as a
percentage of revenue. Going forward, we expect to continue to
derive a significant majority of our total revenues from
indirect channels as we continue to focus on improving the
efficiency of marketing and selling our products through these
channels.
Revenues from shipments to locations outside the United States
increased during fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010 due to
strong demand across all of our geographies but decreased
slightly as a percentage of revenue. We continue to expand into
international locations and introduce our products in new
markets, and we expect international revenues to increase in
absolute dollars and remain consistent or increase as a
percentage of total revenues in fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal
2011.
Total revenues increased 33.8% in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal
2009 primarily due to an increase in product revenues of
$59.5 million. Product revenue increased due to strong
demand and the growth in our customer base. Support revenue grew
$8.4 million in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009 as
substantially all of our customers purchase support when they
purchase our products. The increase in revenue from our indirect
sales channel was primarily due to increased leverage from our
partner relationships.
Cost
of Revenues and Gross Margin
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
396,514
|
|
|
$
|
266,534
|
|
|
$
|
199,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product
|
|
$
|
107,820
|
|
|
$
|
77,070
|
|
|
$
|
59,917
|
|
|
Cost of professional services and support
|
|
|
14,873
|
|
|
|
8,775
|
|
|
|
7,437
|
|
|
Cost of ratable product and related professional services and
support
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
122,703
|
|
|
|
86,074
|
|
|
|
67,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
273,811
|
|
|
$
|
180,460
|
|
|
$
|
131,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
69.1
|
%
|
|
|
67.7
|
%
|
|
|
66.0
|
%
|
During fiscal 2011 total cost of revenues increased 42.6%
compared to fiscal 2010 primarily due to the corresponding
increase in our product revenue. The substantial majority of our
cost of product revenues consists of payments to Flextronics,
our largest contract manufacturer. For fiscal 2011, payments to
Flextronics and Flextronics-related costs constituted
approximately 43% of our cost of product revenues and Sercomm
constituted approximately 33% of our cost of product revenues.
Cost of professional services and support revenues increased
69.5% during fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010. These
increases were primarily due to an increase in headcount in our
support and professional services organization to meet the
growing demand for these services, including personnel who
joined Aruba as a result of the acquisition of Azalea in
September 2010.
Cost of ratable product and related professional services and
support revenues decreased during these periods consistent with
the decrease in ratable product and related professional
services and support revenues.
As we expand internationally, we may incur additional costs to
conform our products to comply with local laws or local product
specifications. In addition, we plan to continue to hire
additional personnel to support our growing international
customer base which would increase our cost of professional
services and support.
45
Gross margins increased 1.4% during fiscal 2011 compared to
fiscal 2010. This increase is due in part to favorable product
mix, timing of support renewals and contracts, and channel mix
partially offset by an increase in our international revenues
and the lower gross margin-profile associated with that revenue.
In fiscal 2010 cost of revenues increased 26.9% compared to
fiscal 2009 primarily due to an increase in our product and
support and professional services revenues. Gross margins
increased 1.7% during fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009
primarily due to product mix of sales on higher-margin
controllers and software and better mix of sales with
higher-margin channel partners. Further, during fiscal 2010
compared to fiscal 2009 we benefitted from economies of scale
within our professional services department that kept our costs
down despite the large increase in professional services and
support revenues.
Research
and Development Expenses
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
$
|
84,890
|
|
|
$
|
51,619
|
|
|
$
|
40,293
|
|
|
Percent of total revenues
|
|
|
21.4
|
%
|
|
|
19.4
|
%
|
|
|
20.3
|
%
|
During fiscal 2011, research and development expenses increased
64.5% compared to fiscal 2010, primarily due to an increase of
$28.9 million in personnel and related costs, including an
increase in stock-based compensation and associated payroll
taxes of $13.1 million. The increase is directly related to
an increase in headcount of 172 employees, including 52
from our acquisition of Azalea. Facilities expenses increased
$1.2 million also due to the increase in headcount and the
acquisition of the Azalea facilities. Expenses for consulting
and outside agencies increased by $1.6 million as we
increased our engineering program spend due to the ongoing
evolution of our product roadmap. Depreciation expenses
increased $1.0 million and software and hardware
maintenance fees increased $0.3 million. Finally,
amortization expense increased $0.2 million as a result of
our two acquisitions in fiscal 2011.
During fiscal 2010, research and development expenses increased
28.1% compared to fiscal 2009, primarily due to an increase of
$8.0 million in personnel and related costs as we added 77
new employees to our research and development team. Personnel
and related costs included $3.6 million in stock-based
compensation and associated payroll taxes. Expenses for
consulting and outside agencies increased $1.3 million due
to design and compliance work for our lower priced access point
and controllers. Facilities expenses increased $1.1 million
related to the increase in headcount. Depreciation expense
increased $0.7 million due to an increase in fixtures,
machinery and equipment used to design and test new products.
Sales
and Marketing Expenses
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
|
$
|
154,239
|
|
|
$
|
109,393
|
|
|
$
|
90,241
|
|
|
Percent of total revenues
|
|
|
38.9
|
%
|
|
|
41.0
|
%
|
|
|
45.3
|
%
|
During fiscal 2011, sales and marketing expenses increased 41.0%
compared to fiscal 2010. Personnel and related costs increased
$29.6 million primarily due to an increase in headcount of
122 employees. An increase in stock-based compensation and
associated payroll taxes of $11.4 million contributed to
the increase in personnel and related costs. Commission expense
increased $10.0 million corresponding to the increase in
revenue. Marketing expenses increased $3.7 million due to
new product launches, specifically for our MOVE architecture
launch, and user-group conventions we hosted. Recruiting
expenses increased $0.7 million as we increased our
headcount. Amortization expense of our purchased intangible
assets increased $0.6 million as a result of our
acquisitions. Finally, depreciation expense increased
$0.3 million primarily due to purchases of computer
equipment to support the increase in headcount.
During fiscal 2010, sales and marketing expenses increased 21.2%
compared to fiscal 2009. Personnel and related costs increased
$11.3 million primarily due to an increase in stock-based
compensation and associated payroll taxes of $4.1 million,
and an increase in headcount of 40 employees. Marketing
expenses increased
46
$2.7 million related to new product launches, website
redesign fees and user-group conventions we hosted. Sales and
marketing expenses were also impacted by an increase in
commission expense of $3.5 million, and an increase in
facilities expenses of $0.8 million due to the increase in
headcount. Finally, demonstration equipment increased
$0.8 million due to the increase in headcount as each new
sales representative is provided demonstration equipment and our
new products were distributed to sales teams.
General
and Administrative Expenses
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
39,431
|
|
|
$
|
30,953
|
|
|
$
|
23,198
|
|
|
Percent of total revenues
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
11.6
|
%
|
|
|
11.6
|
%
|
General and administrative expenses during fiscal 2011 increased
27.4% compared to fiscal 2010. Personnel expenses increased
$8.4 million due to the increase in headcount and an
increase in stock-based compensation and associated payroll
taxes of $3.5 million. Facilities expenses increased
$0.3 million and recruiting expenses increased
$0.5 million, both due to the increase in headcount. Fees
for accounting services increased $0.7 million. Business
costs related to our foreign operations increased
$0.4 million as we expanded internationally. These
increases were offset by a decrease of $1.9 million in
legal expenses. The higher legal expenses in fiscal 2010 were
due to litigation we were involved in at that time and mergers
and acquisitions activity.
During fiscal 2010, general and administrative expenses
increased 33.4% compared to fiscal 2009, primarily due to an
increase of $6.5 million in personnel expenses, including
$4.5 million in stock-based compensation and associated
payroll taxes. Expenses for outside services increased
$0.8 million due to design work associated with our
headquarters building as well as fees paid to consultants
working on our internal systems. Facilities expenses increased
$0.5 million due to an increase in our headcount of
11 employees.
Restructuring
Expenses
In November 2008, as a result of the macroeconomic downturn, our
board of directors approved a plan to reduce our costs and
streamline operations through a combination of a reduction in
our work force and the closing of certain facilities. The
reduction in our work force was completed during fiscal 2009.
Expenses associated with the work force reduction, which were
comprised primarily of severance and benefits payments as well
as professional fees associated with career transition services,
totaled $1.1 million. Additionally, we incurred facility
exit costs of $0.3 million.
Litigation
Reserves
During fiscal 2010, we recorded charges totaling
$21.9 million related to legal matters, which included a
one-time payment to Motorola of $19.8 million as part of a
Patent Cross License and Settlement Agreement we entered into in
November 2009. The remaining $2.1 million of litigation
reserves is related to other settlements entered into during
fiscal 2010.
Other
Income (Expense), net
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
1,018
|
|
|
$
|
834
|
|
|
$
|
1,837
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
2,784
|
|
|
|
(699
|
)
|
|
|
(705
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
3,802
|
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
$
|
1,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income increased during fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal
2010. The increase is primarily due to higher cash and
investment balances in interest-earning accounts. Our average
interest-earning cash and investment balance for fiscal 2011 was
$152.0 million compared to $116.6 million for fiscal
2010.
47
Other income (expense), net increased during fiscal 2011
compared to fiscal 2010 primarily as a result of the change in
the valuation of our contingent rights liability related to the
acquisition of Azalea Networks from $9.5 million at the
date of the acquisition to $5.9 million as of July 31,
2011. See Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for further discussion.
Interest income during fiscal 2010 decreased 54.6% from fiscal
2009, primarily due to declining interest rates. Our average
yield-to-maturity
rate decreased from 2.0% in fiscal 2009 to 0.7% in fiscal 2010.
Other income (expense), net during fiscal 2010 was consistent
with fiscal 2009. Other income (expense) includes primarily
foreign currency gains and losses driven by the remeasurement of
foreign currency transactions into U.S. dollars.
Provision
for Income Taxes
As of July 31, 2011, we had net operating loss
carryforwards of $230.0 million and $156.1 million for
federal and state income tax purposes, respectively. We also had
research and credit carryforwards of $17.4 million for
federal and $18.2 million for state income tax purposes as
of July 31, 2011. Realization of deferred tax assets is
dependent upon future earnings, if any, the timing and amount of
which are uncertain.
If not utilized, the federal and state net operating loss and
federal tax credit carryforwards will begin to expire between
2013 and 2023. Utilization of these net operating losses and
credit carryforwards may be subject to an annual limitation due
to provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
that are applicable if we have experienced an ownership
change in the past, or if an ownership change occurs in
the future.
We continuously monitor the circumstances impacting the expected
realization of our deferred tax assets. As of July 31,
2011, based on available positive evidence, we determined that
the majority of our deferred tax assets would be more likely
than not realizable in the near future, with the exception of
certain foreign net operating loss carryforwards as we cannot
forecast sufficient future foreign source income to realize
these deferred tax assets before they expire. Accordingly, in
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 we recorded a tax benefit of
$72.8 million which was largely attributed to the release
of our valuation allowances and the recording of the associated
net deferred tax assets on our balance sheet. See Note 9 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
We recognize in the Consolidated Financial Statements only those
tax positions determined to be more likely than not of being
sustained. We recorded a net increase of less than
$0.1 million to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits
related to tax positions taken in prior periods. Additionally,
we did not make any reclassifications between current taxes
payable and long-term taxes payable.
48
Quarterly
Fluctuations in Operating Results
The following table sets forth our unaudited quarterly
Consolidated Statement of Operations data for each of the eight
quarters ended July 31, 2011. In managements opinion,
the data has been prepared on the same basis as the audited
Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report, and
reflects all necessary adjustments, consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of this
data.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
2011
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
April 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
97,141
|
|
|
$
|
89,415
|
|
|
$
|
79,100
|
|
|
$
|
69,204
|
|
|
Professional services and support
|
|
|
16,475
|
|
|
|
16,186
|
|
|
|
14,602
|
|
|
|
13,800
|
|
|
Ratable product and related professional services and support
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
113,758
|
|
|
|
105,751
|
|
|
|
93,858
|
|
|
|
83,147
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
31,620
|
|
|
|
29,964
|
|
|
|
24,173
|
|
|
|
22,063
|
|
|
Professional services and support
|
|
|
4,259
|
|
|
|
4,167
|
|
|
|
3,542
|
|
|
|
2,905
|
|
|
Ratable product and related professional services and support
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
35,879
|
|
|
|
34,131
|
|
|
|
27,715
|
|
|
|
24,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
77,879
|
|
|
|
71,620
|
|
|
|
66,143
|
|
|
|
58,169
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
23,370
|
|
|
|
22,799
|
|
|
|
21,608
|
|
|
|
17,113
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
42,972
|
|
|
|
40,916
|
|
|
|
36,936
|
|
|
|
33,415
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11,741
|
|
|
|
10,319
|
|
|
|
10,183
|
|
|
|
7,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
78,083
|
|
|
|
74,034
|
|
|
|
68,727
|
|
|
|
57,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
|
(2,414
|
)
|
|
|
(2,584
|
)
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(4,408
|
)
|
|
|
5,608
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
1,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(4,147
|
)
|
|
|
5,892
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
1,878
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
(4,351
|
)
|
|
|
3,478
|
|
|
|
(2,405
|
)
|
|
|
2,331
|
|
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
(72,536
|
)
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
68,185
|
|
|
$
|
3,201
|
|
|
$
|
(2,833
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per common
share basic
|
|
|
104,310
|
|
|
|
102,055
|
|
|
|
98,795
|
|
|
|
96,037
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share basic
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per common
share diluted
|
|
|
119,600
|
|
|
|
119,367
|
|
|
|
98,795
|
|
|
|
113,271
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share- diluted
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
2010
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
April 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
65,564
|
|
|
$
|
56,634
|
|
|
$
|
52,078
|
|
|
$
|
47,198
|
|
|
Professional services and support
|
|
|
11,651
|
|
|
|
12,167
|
|
|
|
10,362
|
|
|
|
10,143
|
|
|
Ratable product and related professional services and support
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
77,326
|
|
|
|
68,957
|
|
|
|
62,655
|
|
|
|
57,596
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
22,624
|
|
|
|
19,911
|
|
|
|
18,103
|
|
|
|
16,432
|
|
|
Professional services and support
|
|
|
2,338
|
|
|
|
2,201
|
|
|
|
2,157
|
|
|
|
2,079
|
|
|
Ratable product and related professional services and support
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
24,991
|
|
|
|
22,158
|
|
|
|
20,328
|
|
|
|
18,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
52,335
|
|
|
|
46,799
|
|
|
|
42,327
|
|
|
|
38,999
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
13,907
|
|
|
|
13,874
|
|
|
|
12,042
|
|
|
|
11,796
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
30,380
|
|
|
|
27,697
|
|
|
|
26,576
|
|
|
|
24,740
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
7,353
|
|
|
|
8,840
|
|
|
|
7,628
|
|
|
|
7,132
|
|
|
Litigation reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
19,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
51,640
|
|
|
|
52,061
|
|
|
|
46,746
|
|
|
|
63,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
695
|
|
|
|
(5,262
|
)
|
|
|
(4,419
|
)
|
|
|
(24,419
|
)
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
647
|
|
|
|
(5,233
|
)
|
|
|
(4,380
|
)
|
|
|
(24,304
|
)
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
423
|
|
|
$
|
(5,318
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,427
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,676
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per common share,
basic
|
|
|
92,977
|
|
|
|
90,874
|
|
|
|
88,572
|
|
|
|
87,489
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share, basic
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per common share,
diluted
|
|
|
108,814
|
|
|
|
90,874
|
|
|
|
88,572
|
|
|
|
87,489
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share, diluted
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our operating results may fluctuate due to a variety of factors,
many of which are outside of our control. As a result, comparing
our operating results on a
period-to-period
basis may not be meaningful. You should not rely on our past
results as an indication of our future performance.
50
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
269,900
|
|
|
$
|
133,927
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
80,773
|
|
|
|
31,254
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
$
|
153,185
|
|
|
$
|
124,167
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
57,990
|
|
|
$
|
25,834
|
|
|
$
|
20,592
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(44,916
|
)
|
|
|
(48,581
|
)
|
|
|
(21,754
|
)
|
|
Cash provided by financing activities
|
|
$
|
36,446
|
|
|
$
|
12,702
|
|
|
$
|
4,858
|
|
As of July 31, 2011, our principal sources of liquidity
were our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. Cash
and cash equivalents are comprised of cash, sweep funds and
money market funds with an original maturity of 90 days or
less at the time of the purchase. Short-term investments include
corporate bonds, U.S. government agency securities,
U.S. treasury bills, commercial paper, and certificates of
deposit. Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
increased $78.5 million during fiscal 2011 from
$155.4 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments as of July 31, 2010 to $234.0 million as
of July 31, 2011.
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities
Our cash flows from operating activities will continue to be
affected principally by our profitability, working capital
requirements, the extent to which we increase spending on
personnel and the continued growth in revenue and cash
collections. The timing of hiring sales personnel in particular
affects cash flows as there is a lag between the hiring of sales
personnel and the generation of revenue and cash flows from
sales personnel. Our largest source of operating cash flows is
cash collections from our customers. Our primary uses of cash
from operating activities are for personnel related
expenditures, purchases of inventory, and rent payments.
During fiscal 2011, net cash provided by operating activities
increased $32.2 million compared to fiscal 2010. The
increase in cash flow from operating activities was primarily
due to an increase in cash flow of $61.3 million from
operations after adjusting for non-cash items, including
depreciation and amortization, and stock-based compensation, and
a decrease of $29.1 million from the change in operating
assets and liabilities.
During fiscal 2010, net cash provided by operating activities
increased $5.2 million compared to fiscal 2009. The
increase in cash flow from operating activities was primarily
due to an increase in cash flow of $2.1 million from
operations after adjusting for non-cash items, including
depreciation and amortization, and stock-based compensation, and
a decrease of $3.1 million from the change in operating
assets and liabilities. Further, in November 2009, pursuant to
the Settlement Agreement with Motorola, we made a one-time
payment to Motorola for $19.8 million.
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities during fiscal 2011 decreased
$3.7 million compared to fiscal 2010. We continue to invest
our excess cash balances in short-term investments. Some of the
proceeds from the sale and maturity of these investments were
used to purchase property and equipment of $9.9 million
during fiscal 2011. Further, we completed two acquisitions
during fiscal 2011 for a total of $4.3 million in cash, net
of cash received. See Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Cash used in investing activities increased $26.8 million
during fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009. We purchased more
short-term investments during fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal
2009 as we reinvested cash flow from operations. We also sold
fewer short-term investments in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal
2009. Purchases of property and equipment in fiscal 2010 were
slightly up compared to fiscal 2009 due to the build-out of our
office headquarters.
51
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities increased
$23.7 million during fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010.
The cash proceeds from the issuance of common stock in
conjunction with our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan and Employee
Stock Purchase Plan increased substantially
year-over-year
primarily due to increased exercises of stock options by our
employees as a result of the increase in our exercise price and
an increase in the amount of contributions in our Employee Stock
Purchase Plan.
Cash provided by financing activities increased
$7.8 million in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009 also
due to the cash proceeds from the issuance of common stock in
conjunction with our equity plans as described above. During
fiscal 2009 we repurchased shares of our common stock under our
stock repurchase program in the amount of $1.0 million. We
did not make any additional purchases in fiscal 2010 or fiscal
2011 related to that program.
Based on our current cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments we expect that we will have sufficient resources to
fund our operations for the next 12 months. However, we may
need to raise additional capital or incur additional
indebtedness to continue to fund our operations in the future.
Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors,
including our rate of revenue growth, the expansion of our sales
and marketing activities, the timing and extent of expansion
into new territories, the timing of introductions of new
products and enhancements to existing products, and the
continuing market acceptance of our products.
Contractual
Obligations
The following is a summary of our contractual obligations:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
1 3
|
|
|
3 5
|
|
|
Than
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
$
|
20,434
|
|
|
$
|
4,823
|
|
|
$
|
8,383
|
|
|
$
|
7,228
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Non-cancellable inventory purchase commitments(1)
|
|
|
29,747
|
|
|
|
29,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
50,181
|
|
|
$
|
34,570
|
|
|
$
|
8,383
|
|
|
$
|
7,228
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We outsource the production of our hardware to third-party
manufacturing suppliers. We enter into various inventory related
purchase agreements with these suppliers. Under the agreement
with our main contract manufacturer, 40% of the order quantities
can be rescheduled or are cancelable by giving notice
60 days prior to the expected shipment date, and 20% of the
order quantities can be rescheduled or are cancelable by giving
notice 30 days prior to the expected shipment date. Orders
are not cancelable within 30 days prior to the expected
shipment date. |
As of July 31, 2011, our unrecognized tax benefits were
$10.9 million which were mostly reflected as a reduction to
deferred tax assets, offset by a valuation allowance. As such,
there are no material amounts of contractual obligations
associated with these unrecognized benefits to be included in
the table above.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
As of July 31, 2011 and 2010, we did not have any
relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial
partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured
finance or special purpose entities, which would have been
established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet
arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
|
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
Foreign
Currency Risk
Most of our sales contracts are denominated in
U.S. Dollars, and therefore, our revenue is not subject to
significant foreign currency risk. Our operating expenses and
cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign
currency exchange rates, particularly changes in the British
Pound, Euro, and Chinese Yuan. To date, we
52
have not entered into any hedging contracts because expenses in
foreign currencies have been insignificant, and exchange rate
fluctuations have had little impact on our operating results and
cash flows.
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
We had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
totaling $234.0 million and $155.4 million at
July 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The cash, cash
equivalents and short-term investments are held for working
capital purposes. We do not use derivative financial instruments
in our investment portfolio. We have an investment portfolio of
fixed income securities that are classified as
available-for-sale
securities. These securities, like all fixed income
instruments, are subject to interest rate risk and will fall in
value if market interest rates increase. We attempt to limit
this exposure by investing primarily in short-term securities.
Due to the short duration and conservative nature of our
investment portfolio, a movement of 10% in market interest rates
would not have a material impact on our operating results and
the total value of the portfolio over the next fiscal year. If
overall interest rates had fallen by 10% during fiscal 2011, our
interest income on cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments would have declined less than $0.1 million
assuming consistent investment levels.
53
|
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
Index to
Consolidated Financial Statements
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
54
MANAGEMENTS
REPORT ON
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management of our Company is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting
as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and 15(d)-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our
internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
| |
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of our Company;
|
| |
| |
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of our Company; and
|
| |
| |
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our
Companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
|
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions and that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may change over
time.
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting as of July 31, 2011. In making
this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Based upon this assessment, management has
concluded that, as of July 31, 2011, our internal control
over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
The effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of July 31, 2011 has been audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears on the
following page.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael
M. Galvin
|
|
|
|
|
Dominic P. Orr
President and Chief Executive Officer
September 27, 2011
|
|
Michael M. Galvin
Chief Financial Officer
September 27, 2011
|
55
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Aruba Networks, Inc.:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and
the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Aruba Networks,
Inc. and its subsidiaries at July 31, 2011 and
July 31, 2010, and the results of their operations and
their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
July 31, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition,
in our opinion, the financial statement schedules listed in the
accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the
information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the
related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion,
the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as of July 31,
2011, based on criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). The Companys management is responsible for these
financial statements and financial statement schedules, for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these
financial statements, on the financial statement schedules, and
on the Companys internal control over financial reporting
based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement and whether effective internal control over
financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our
audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal
control over financial reporting included obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting,
assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also
included performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC
San Jose, California
September 27, 2011
56
ARUBA
NETWORKS, INC.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
80,773
|
|
|
$
|
31,254
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
153,185
|
|
|
|
124,167
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
68,598
|
|
|
|
41,269
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
29,895
|
|
|
|
15,159
|
|
|
Deferred costs
|
|
|
6,999
|
|
|
|
5,451
|
|
|
Prepaids and other
|
|
|
5,097
|
|
|
|
5,108
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
53,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
397,857
|
|
|
|
222,408
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
14,772
|
|
|
|
9,919
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
33,143
|
|
|
|
7,656
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
20,863
|
|
|
|
9,287
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
20,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,093
|
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
488,871
|
|
|
$
|
250,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
11,278
|
|
|
$
|
8,082
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
61,461
|
|
|
|
36,458
|
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
Deferred revenue, current
|
|
|
54,451
|
|
|
|
43,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
127,957
|
|
|
|
88,481
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liability
|
|
|
815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue, long-term
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
10,976
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
143,529
|
|
|
|
100,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock: $0.0001 par value; 350,000 shares
authorized at July 31, 2011 and 2010 , respectively;
104,905 and 93,606 shares issued and outstanding at
July 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
450,147
|
|
|
|
326,178
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(104,942
|
)
|
|
|
(175,630
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
345,342
|
|
|
|
150,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
488,871
|
|
|
$
|
250,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
57
ARUBA
NETWORKS, INC.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
334,860
|
|
|
$
|
221,474
|
|
|
$
|
161,927
|
|
|
Professional services and support
|
|
|
61,063
|
|
|
|
44,323
|
|
|
|
35,946
|
|
|
Ratable product and related professional services and support
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
396,514
|
|
|
|
266,534
|
|
|
|
199,259
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
107,820
|
|
|
|
77,070
|
|
|
|
59,917
|
|
|
Professional services and support
|
|
|
14,873
|
|
|
|
8,775
|
|
|
|
7,437
|
|
|
Ratable product and related professional services and support
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
122,703
|
|
|
|
86,074
|
|
|
|
67,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
273,811
|
|
|
|
180,460
|
|
|
|
131,422
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
84,890
|
|
|
|
51,619
|
|
|
|
40,293
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
154,239
|
|
|
|
109,393
|
|
|
|
90,241
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
39,431
|
|
|
|
30,953
|
|
|
|
23,198
|
|
|
Restructuring expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,447
|
|
|
Litigation reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
278,560
|
|
|
|
213,865
|
|
|
|
155,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(4,749
|
)
|
|
|
(33,405
|
)
|
|
|
(23,757
|
)
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,018
|
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
1,837
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
2,784
|
|
|
|
(699
|
)
|
|
|
(705
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
|
3,802
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
1,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
(947
|
)
|
|
|
(33,270
|
)
|
|
|
(22,625
|
)
|
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
(71,635
|
)
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
70,688
|
|
|
$
|
(33,998
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,413
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per common
share basic
|
|
|
100,299
|
|
|
|
89,978
|
|
|
|
84,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share basic
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per common
share diluted
|
|
|
117,117
|
|
|
|
89,978
|
|
|
|
84,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share diluted
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense included in above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
3,464
|
|
|
$
|
1,397
|
|
|
$
|
1,018
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
23,026
|
|
|
|
10,716
|
|
|
|
7,577
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
24,399
|
|
|
|
14,205
|
|
|
|
10,520
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
$
|
12,862
|
|
|
$
|
9,763
|
|
|
$
|
5,464
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
58
ARUBA
NETWORKS, INC.
STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 31, 2008
|
|
|
82,836
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
249,131
|
|
|
$
|
(45
|
)
|
|
$
|
(118,219
|
)
|
|
$
|
130,875
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on short-term investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,413
|
)
|
|
|
(23,413
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,186
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of shares issued to non-employees
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
Fair value of stock options issued to non-employees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
Exercise of common stock options
|
|
|
1,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,943
|
|
|
Shares purchased under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
1,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,827
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options and
awards issued to employees
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
24,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,151
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock under stock repurchase program
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(991
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(991
|
)
|
|
Excess tax benefit associated with stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 31, 2009
|
|
|
86,744
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
279,026
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
(141,632
|
)
|
|
|
137,585
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on short-term investments, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,998
|
)
|
|
|
(33,998
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,082
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of shares issued to non-employees
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,385
|
|
|
Fair value of stock options issued to non-employees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
Exercise of common stock options
|
|
|
2,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,116
|
|
|
Shares purchased under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,515
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options and
awards issued to employees
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,683
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit associated with stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 31, 2010
|
|
|
93,606
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
326,178
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
(175,630
|
)
|
|
|
150,655
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on short-term investments, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,688
|
|
|
|
70,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of shares issued to non-employees
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,952
|
|
|
Exercise of common stock options
|
|
|
6,413
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
29,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,752
|
|
|
Shares purchased under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
2,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,889
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options and
awards issued to employees
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,879
|
|
|
Common stock issued in purchase acquisition
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,691
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit associated with stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 31, 2011
|
|
|
104,905
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
450,147
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
$
|
(104,942
|
)
|
|
$
|
345,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
59
ARUBA
NETWORKS, INC.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
70,688
|
|
|
$
|
(33,998
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,413
|
)
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
15,042
|
|
|
|
10,091
|
|
|
|
9,686
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
Write-downs for excess and obsolete inventory
|
|
|
2,647
|
|
|
|
2,949
|
|
|
|
3,397
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
63,750
|
|
|
|
36,081
|
|
|
|
24,579
|
|
|
Accretion of purchase discounts on short-term investments
|
|
|
1,290
|
|
|
|
837
|
|
|
|
(271
|
)
|
|
Gains on disposal of fixed assets
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
Change in carrying value of contingent rights liability
|
|
|
(3,598
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(72,638
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit associated with stock-based compensation
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(24,821
|
)
|
|
|
(8,069
|
)
|
|
|
(924
|
)
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(16,900
|
)
|
|
|
(10,653
|
)
|
|
|
(766
|
)
|
|
Prepaids and other
|
|
|
(1,658
|
)
|
|
|
(2,757
|
)
|
|
|
847
|
|
|
Deferred costs
|
|
|
(1,548
|
)
|
|
|
(290
|
)
|
|
|
(606
|
)
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
5,937
|
|
|
|
(4,926
|
)
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
12,713
|
|
|
|
11,220
|
|
|
|
8,698
|
|
|
Other current and noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
13,331
|
|
|
|
14,360
|
|
|
|
4,184
|
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
57,990
|
|
|
|
25,834
|
|
|
|
20,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of short-term investments
|
|
|
(144,512
|
)
|
|
|
(122,750
|
)
|
|
|
(101,088
|
)
|
|
Proceeds from sales of short-term investments
|
|
|
28,927
|
|
|
|
10,566
|
|
|
|
40,443
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities of short-term investments
|
|
|
84,870
|
|
|
|
68,860
|
|
|
|
43,296
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(9,909
|
)
|
|
|
(5,299
|
)
|
|
|
(4,405
|
)
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid in purchase acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(4,303
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(44,916
|
)
|
|
|
(48,581
|
)
|
|
|
(21,754
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
36,640
|
|
|
|
12,631
|
|
|
|
5,761
|
|
|
Repurchases of unvested common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of common stock under stock repurchase program
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(991
|
)
|
|
Excess tax benefit associated with stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
36,446
|
|
|
|
12,702
|
|
|
|
4,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
49,519
|
|
|
|
(10,044
|
)
|
|
|
3,696
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
31,254
|
|
|
|
41,298
|
|
|
|
37,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
80,773
|
|
|
$
|
31,254
|
|
|
$
|
41,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
1,152
|
|
|
$
|
899
|
|
|
$
|
673
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and
financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for purchase acquisition
|
|
$
|
28,691
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Contingent rights issued for purchase acquisition
|
|
$
|
9,486
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
60
ARUBA
NETWORKS, INC.
|
|
|
1.
|
The
Company and its Significant Accounting Policies
|
The
Company
Aruba Networks, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated
in the state of Delaware on February 11, 2002. The Company
is a leading provider of next-generation network access
solutions for the mobile enterprise. Its Mobile Virtual
Enterprise (MOVE) architecture unifies wired and
wireless network infrastructures into one seamless access
solution for corporate headquarters, mobile business
professionals, remote workers and guests. The Company derives
its revenues from sales of its ArubaOS operating system,
controllers, wired and wireless access points, switches,
application software modules, multi-vendor management solution
software, and professional services and support. The Company has
offices in North America, Europe, the Middle East and the Asia
Pacific region and employs staff around the world.
Significant
Accounting Policies
Basis of
Presentation
The Companys Consolidated Financial Statements have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. During the first
quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company determined that the fair
values assigned to certain warrants to purchase preferred stock
issued to non-employees were not computed correctly as of the
IPO closing date when they automatically converted to warrants
to purchase common stock which resulted in $715,000 of excess
warrant expense being recognized in other income (expense), net
in the third quarter of fiscal 2007. During the first quarter of
fiscal 2009, the Company corrected the valuation of these
warrants resulting in the inclusion of other income of $715,000
within other income (expense), net and a reduction of additional
paid-in capital of $715,000. In addition, during the first
quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company determined that stock-based
compensation related to its employee stock purchase plan was
understated by $48,000 and $87,000 in the third and fourth
quarters of fiscal 2007, respectively. During the first quarter
of fiscal 2009, the Company corrected these errors resulting in
the inclusion of $135,000 of additional stock-based compensation
within the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three
months ended October 31, 2007. The Company and its Audit
Committee concluded that these errors were not material to the
third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2007, the fiscal year ended
July 31, 2007 or the results for the year ending
July 31, 2009, and therefore, the corrections were recorded
in the first quarter of fiscal 2009.
Principles
of Consolidation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the
accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of these financial statements requires that the
Company make estimates and judgments that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and
related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an
on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including
those related to provisions for doubtful accounts, sales
returns, inventory, warranties useful lives of property and
equipment, useful lives of intangible assets, income taxes and
the valuation of equity instruments and contingencies, amongst
others. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience
and on various other assumptions that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form
the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of
assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Actual results could differ from the estimates made by
management with respect to these and other items.
61
ARUBA
NETWORKS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Foreign
Currency Accounting
While the majority of the Companys revenue contracts are
denominated in United States (U.S) dollars, the
Company has foreign operations that incur expenses in various
foreign currencies. The functional currency of the
Companys subsidiaries is U.S. dollar. Monetary assets
and liabilities are remeasured using the current exchange rate
at the balance sheet date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities
and capital accounts are remeasured using historical exchange
rates. Revenues and expenses are remeasured using the average
exchange rates in effect during the period. Foreign currency
exchange gains and losses, which have not been material for any
periods presented, are included in the Consolidated Statements
of Operations under other income (expense), net.
Risks and
Uncertainties
The Company is subject to all of the risks inherent in operating
in the networking and communications industry. These risks
include, but are not limited to, a limited operating history,
new and rapidly evolving markets, a lengthy sales cycle,
dependence on the development of new products and services,
unfavorable economic and market conditions, customer acceptance
of new products, competition from larger and more established
companies, limited management resources, dependence on a limited
number of contract manufacturers and suppliers, and the changing
nature of the networking and communications industry. Failure by
the Company to anticipate or to respond adequately to
technological developments in its industry, changes in customer
or supplier requirements, changes in regulatory requirements or
industry standards, or any significant delays in the development
or introduction of products and services, would have a material
adverse effect on the Companys business, operating results
and financial position.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The reported amounts of the Companys financial instruments
including cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts
receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value due to
their short maturities.
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid marketable securities
purchased with an original maturity of 90 days or less at
the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash
equivalents is comprised of cash, sweep funds and money market
funds and are stated at cost, which approximates fair value.
Short-Term
Investments
Short-term investments comprise marketable securities that
consist primarily of corporate bonds, U.S. government
agency securities, U.S. treasury bills, commercial paper
and certificates of deposit with original maturities beyond
90 days. As the Company views all securities as
representing the investment of funds available for current
operations, and management has the ability and intent, if
necessary, to liquidate any of these investments in order to
meet the Companys liquidity needs within the next
12 months, the short-term investments are classified as
current assets. The Companys policy is to protect the
value of its investment portfolio and minimize principal risk by
earning returns based on current interest rates. All of the
Companys marketable securities are classified as
available-for-sale.
The Company reviews the individual securities in its portfolio
to determine whether a decline in a securitys fair value
below the amortized cost basis is
other-than-temporary.
If other than temporary impairment (OTTI) has been
incurred, and it is more likely than not that the Company will
not sell the investment security before the recovery of its
amortized cost basis, then the OTTI is separated into
(a) the amount representing the credit loss and
(b) the amount related to all other factors. The amount of
the total OTTI related to the credit loss is recognized in
earnings. The amount of the total OTTI related to other factors
is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive
62
ARUBA
NETWORKS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
income. The Company determined that there were no investments in
its portfolio that were other-than temporarily impaired as of
July 31, 2011 and 2010.
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a
concentration of credit risk include cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments. The Company has not experienced any
losses on its deposits of its cash and cash equivalents, and its
short-term investments due to concentration of credit risk.
The Companys accounts receivable are derived from revenue
earned from customers located in the Americas, Europe, the
Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific. The Company performs
ongoing credit evaluations of its customers financial
condition and generally requires no collateral from its
customers. The Company maintains a provision for doubtful
accounts receivable based upon the expected collectibility of
accounts receivable, and to date such losses have been within
managements expectations. See Note 11 in these Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements for more details on
significant customers.
Provision
for Doubtful Accounts
The Company records a provision for doubtful accounts based on
historical experience and a detailed assessment of the
collectibility of its accounts receivable. In estimating the
allowance for doubtful accounts, management considers, among
other factors, (i) the aging of the accounts receivable,
including trends within and ratios involving the age of the
accounts receivable, (ii) the Companys historical
write-offs, (iii) the credit-worthiness of each customer,
(iv) the economic conditions of the customers
industry, and (v) general economic conditions. In cases
where the Company is aware of circumstances that may impair a
specific customers ability to meet their financial
obligations to it, the Company records a specific allowance
against amounts due from the customer, and thereby reduces the
net recognized receivable to the amount it reasonably believes
will be collected.
Charges to the income statement relating to allowance for
doubtful accounts were less than $0.1 million,
$0.3 million, and $0.1 million, for the fiscal years
ended July 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively.
Inventory
Inventory consists of hardware and related component parts and
is stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is computed using
the standard cost, which approximates actual cost, on a
first-in,
first-out basis. The Company records inventory write-downs for
potentially excess inventory based on forecasted demand,
economic trends and technological obsolescence of its products.
At the point of loss recognition, a new, lower-cost basis for
that inventory is established, and subsequent changes in facts
and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase
in that newly established cost basis. Inventory write-downs are
reflected as cost of product revenues and amounted to
approximately $2.6 million, $2.9 million, and
$3.4 million, for the fiscal years ended July 31,
2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively.
Deferred
Costs
When the Companys products have been delivered, but the
product revenue associated with the arrangement has been
deferred as a result of not meeting the revenue recognition
criteria, the Company also defers the related inventory costs
for the delivered items.
Property
and Equipment, net
Property and equipment, net are stated at historical cost less
accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the
straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful
lives of the respective assets, generally ranging from two to
six years, or the lease term, if applicable. Leasehold
improvements are recorded at
63
ARUBA
NETWORKS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
cost with any reimbursement from the landlord being accounted
for as part of rent expense using the straight-line method over
the lease term.
Upon retirement or sale, the cost of assets disposed of and the
related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts
and any resulting gain or loss is credited or charged to the
statement of operations, under other income (expense), net.
Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense
as incurred.
Impairment
of Long-lived Assets
Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized using the
straight-line method over the estimated economic lives of the
assets, which range from one to seven years. Long-lived assets,
including intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable.
Determination of recoverability is based on an estimate of
undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the
asset and its eventual disposition. Measurement of an impairment
loss for long-lived assets that management expects to hold and
use are based on the fair value of the asset. The Company did
not recognize impairment charges in any of the periods presented.
Goodwill
The Company performs an annual goodwill impairment test during
the fourth quarter of the fiscal year and when triggering events
are present. For purposes of impairment testing, the Company
determined that it has only one reporting unit. The
identification and measurement of goodwill impairment involves
the estimation of the fair value of the Company. The estimates
of fair value of the Company are based on the best information
available as of the date of the assessment, which primarily
includes the Companys market capitalization. As of the
date of the assessment, the market capitalization of the Company
was substantially in excess of its carrying value. As a result,
the Company did not recognize impairment charges in any of the
periods presented.
Revenue
Recognition and Sales Returns
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) amended the accounting standards for revenue
recognition to remove tangible products containing software
components and non-software components that function together to
deliver the products essential functionality from the
scope of industry-specific software revenue recognition
guidance. In October 2009, the FASB also amended the accounting
standards for multiple-element revenue arrangements to:
(i) provide updated guidance on how the elements in a
multiple-element arrangement should be separated, and how the
consideration should be allocated;
(ii) require an entity to allocate revenue amongst the
elements in an arrangement using estimated selling prices
(ESP) if a vendor does not have vendor-specific
objective evidence (VSOE) of the selling price or
third-party evidence (TPE) of the selling
price; and
(iii) eliminate the use of the residual method and require
an entity to allocate revenue using the relative selling price
method.
The Company adopted this accounting guidance at the beginning of
its first quarter of fiscal 2011 on a prospective basis for
applicable arrangements originating or materially modified after
July 31, 2010. The impact of this adoption was not material
to the Companys financial position and results of
operations during fiscal 2011.
This guidance does not generally change the units of accounting
for the Companys revenue transactions. Most non-software
products and services qualify as separate units of accounting
because they have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis
and the Companys revenue arrangements generally do not
include a right of return relative to delivered products.
64
ARUBA
NETWORKS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The majority of the Companys products are hardware
appliances containing software components that function together
to provide the essential functionality of the product.
Therefore, the Companys hardware appliances are considered
non-software elements and are not subject to the
industry-specific software revenue recognition guidance.
The Companys product revenue also includes revenue from
the sale of stand-alone software products. Stand-alone software
products may operate on the Companys hardware appliance
but are not considered essential to the functionality of the
hardware. Sales of stand-alone software generally include a
perpetual license to the Companys software. Sales of
stand-alone software continue to be subject to the
industry-specific software revenue recognition guidance.
For all arrangements originating or materially modified after
July 31, 2010, the Company recognizes revenue in accordance
with the amended accounting guidance. Certain arrangements with
multiple-elements may continue to have stand-alone software
elements that are subject to the existing software revenue
recognition guidance along with non-software elements that are
subject to the amended revenue accounting guidance. The revenue
for these multiple element arrangements is allocated to the
stand-alone software elements as a group and the non-software
elements based on the relative selling prices of all of the
elements in the arrangement using the fair value hierarchy in
the amended revenue accounting guidance.
For sales of stand-alone software after July 31, 2010 and
for all transactions entered into prior to the first quarter of
2011, the Company recognizes revenue based on software revenue
recognition guidance. Under the software revenue recognition
guidance, the Company uses the residual method to recognize
revenue when a product agreement includes one or more elements
to be delivered at a future date and VSOE of the fair value of
all undelivered elements exists. In the majority of the
Companys contracts, the only element that remains
undelivered at the time of delivery of the product is support
services. Under the residual method, the fair value of the
undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of
the contract fee is recognized as product revenue. If evidence
of the fair value of one or more undelivered elements does not
exist, all revenue is generally deferred and recognized when
delivery of those elements occurs or when fair value can be
established. When the undelivered element for which the Company
does not have VSOE of fair value is support, revenue for the
entire arrangement is bundled and recognized ratably over the
support period.
VSOE for elements of an arrangement is based upon the normal
pricing and discounting practices for those services when sold
separately, and VSOE for support services is measured by the
stand-alone renewal rate offered to the customer. In determining
VSOE, the Company requires that a substantial majority of the
selling prices for an element falls within a reasonably narrow
pricing range, generally evidenced by a substantial majority of
such historical stand-alone transactions falling within a
reasonably narrow range of the median rates. In addition, the
Company considers major service groups, geographies, customer
classifications, and other variables in determining VSOE.
The Company is typically not able to determine TPE for the
Companys products or services. TPE is determined based on
competitor prices for similar elements when sold separately.
Generally, the Companys
go-to-market
strategy differs from that of the Companys peers and the
Companys offerings contain a significant level of
differentiation such that the comparable pricing of products
with similar functionality cannot be obtained. Furthermore, the
Company is unable to reliably determine what similar competitor
products selling prices are on a stand-alone basis.
When the Company is unable to establish the selling price of its
non-software elements using VSOE or TPE, the Company uses ESP in
its allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of
ESP is to determine the price at which the Company would
transact a sale if the product or service were sold on a
stand-alone basis. The Company determines ESP for a product or
service by considering multiple factors including, but not
limited to, cost of products, gross margin objectives, pricing
practices, geographies, customer classes and distribution
channels.
65
ARUBA
NETWORKS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company regularly reviews VSOE and ESP and maintains
internal controls over the establishment and updates of these
estimates. There was not a material impact during the third
quarter or first nine months of fiscal 2011, nor does the
Company currently expect a material impact in the near term from
changes in VSOE or ESP.
Product revenue consists of revenue from sales of the
Companys hardware appliances and perpetual software
licenses. The Company recognizes product revenue when all of the
following have occurred: (1) the Company has entered into a
legally binding arrangement with a customer; (2) delivery
has occurred; (3) customer payment is deemed fixed or
determinable and free of contingencies and significant
uncertainties; and (4) collection is reasonably assured.
For sales to direct end-users and channel partners, including
value-added resellers (VARs), value-added
distributors (VADs), and original equipment
manufacturers (OEMs), the Company recognizes product
revenue upon delivery, assuming all other revenue recognition
criteria are met. For the Companys hardware appliances,
delivery occurs upon transfer of title and risk of loss, which
is generally upon shipment. It is the Companys practice to
identify an end-user prior to shipment to a channel partner. For
end-users and channel partners, the Company generally has no
significant obligations for future performance such as rights of
return or pricing credits. A portion of the Companys sales
are made through distributors under agreements allowing for
stocking of the Companys products in their inventory,
pricing credits and limited rights of return for stock rotation.
Product revenue on sales made through these distributors is
initially deferred and revenue is recognized upon sell-through
as reported by the distributors to the Company. Shipping charges
billed to customers are included in product revenue and the
related shipping costs are included in cost of product revenue.
The amount of inventory held by resellers pending a sale to an
end customer was $2.0 million and $3.7 million as of
July 31, 2011 and 2010.
Support and services offerings consist of support agreements,
professional services, and training. Support services include
repair and replacement of defective hardware appliances,
software updates and access to technical support personnel.
Software updates provide customers with rights to unspecified
software product upgrades and to maintenance releases and
patches released during the term of the support period. Revenue
for support services is recognized on a straight-line basis over
the service contract term, which is typically one to five years.
Revenue for professional services is recognized upon delivery or
completion of performance. Professional service arrangements are
typically short-term in nature and are largely completed within
90 days from the start of service. Revenue for training
services is recognized upon delivery of the training.
The related sale of support services to a reseller occurs when a
specific sale to an end customer occurs. If the sale of support
services occurs at the same time as the Company receives the
initial purchase order from the reseller, the support services
are included on that purchase order and recognized ratably over
the related support period, commencing on the date of delivery
to the end customer. If the sale of support services occurs
after the Company receives the initial purchase order, the
support services for the specific product sales are purchased on
a subsequent purchase order. The subsequent purchase order is
received at the time the
point-of-sale
(POS) report is provided for all product sales that
occurred during the month. The support services are recognized
ratably over the related support period, commencing from the
delivery date to each respective end customer.
Post-contractual services (PCS) that the Company
provides to its channel partners differs from PCS that the
Company provides to its end customers in that the Company is
only obligated to provide support services to the channel
partner directly, while the channel partner is obligated to
provide support services directly to the end customer. The
channel partner is obligated to provide Level 1 and
Level 2 support services to the end customer, including
technical support and returned merchandise fulfillment
(RMA) fulfillment, while the Companys
obligations are only to provide software upgrades and
Level 3 technical support in the unusual scenario in which
the channel partner is unable to provide the technical support
that the end customer requires.
The Companys fees are typically considered to be fixed or
determinable at the inception of an arrangement, generally based
on specific products and quantities to be delivered.
Substantially all of the Companys contracts do not include
rights of return or acceptance provisions. To the extent that
the Companys agreements contain such
66
ARUBA
NETWORKS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
terms, the Company recognizes revenue once the customer has
accepted, or once the acceptance provisions or right of return
lapses. Payment terms to customers generally range from net 30
to 60 days. In the event payment terms are provided that
differ from the Companys standard business practices, the
fees are deemed to not be fixed or determinable and revenue is
recognized when the payments become due, provided the remaining
criteria for revenue recognition have been met.
The Company assesses the ability to collect from its customers
based on a number of factors, including credit worthiness of the
customer and past transaction history of the customer. If the
customer is not deemed credit worthy, the Company defers revenue
from the arrangement until payment is received and all other
revenue recognition criteria have been met. The Company records
estimated sales returns as a reduction to revenues upon shipment
based on its contractual obligations and historical returns
experience. In cases where the Company is aware of circumstances
that will likely result in a specific customers request to
return purchased equipment, the Company records a specific sales
returns reserve.
Shipping charges billed to customers are included in product
revenues and the related shipping costs are included in cost of
product revenues.
Research
and Development Expenses
Research and development expenditures are charged to operations
as incurred and consist primarily of compensation costs,
including stock-based compensation costs, outside services,
expensed materials, depreciation and an allocation of overhead
expenses, including facilities and IT costs. Software
development costs incurred prior to the establishment of
technological feasibility are included in research and
development and are expensed as incurred.
After technological feasibility is established, material
software development costs are capitalized. The capitalized cost
is amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated product
life, or on the ratio of current revenues to total projected
product revenues, whichever is greater. To date, the period
between achieving technological feasibility, which the Company
has defined as the establishment of a working model, which
typically occurs when beta testing commences, and the general
availability of such software has been short and software
development costs qualifying for capitalization have been
insignificant. Accordingly, the Company has not capitalized any
software development costs.
Stock-Based
Compensation
The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all
stock-based payment awards made to employees and non-employees
based on estimated fair values. The Companys stock-based
payment awards include stock options, restricted stock units and
awards, employee stock purchase plan awards, and
performance-based awards, which require an assessment of the
probability of vesting. The Company calculates the fair value of
restricted stock and performance-based awards which are paid in
restricted stock, based on the fair market value of its stock on
the date of grant. The Company calculates the fair value of
stock options and employee stock purchase plan shares on the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This
methodology requires the use of subjective assumptions such as
expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards,
actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors,
risk-free interest rates and expected dividends. This fair value
is then amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite
service periods of the awards, which is generally the vesting
period. The Company determines the amount of stock-based
compensation expense based on awards that it ultimately expects
to vest, reduced for estimated forfeitures. In addition,
compensation expense includes the effects of awards modified,
repurchased or cancelled.
67
ARUBA
NETWORKS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Income
Taxes
The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting
for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the estimated future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the consolidated financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities
and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets are
recognized for deductible temporary differences, along with net
operating loss carryforwards, if it is more likely than not that
the tax benefits will be realized. The ultimate realization of
the deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of
future taxable income during the periods in which those
temporary differences, research credit carryforwards and net
operating loss carryforwards are deductible. To the extent
deferred tax assets cannot be recognized under the preceding
criteria, a valuation allowance is established.
As a result of the Companys increasing profitability in
fiscal 2011 and expectations for continued profits going
forward, the Company determined that it is more likely than not
that future profitability will be sufficient to realize deferred
income tax assets. In addition, the Company has determined there
will be sufficient California taxable income such that it is
more likely than not the California research credits available
as of fiscal year 2011 would be realizable in the near future.
The Company will continue to assess whether a valuation
allowance is necessary for any future California research
credits generated. In accordance with Accounting Standards
Codification Topic 740, Income Taxes
(ASC 740) and related literature, the Company
released a majority of its valuation allowances against its
deferred income tax assets in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011.
Net income for fiscal 2011 includes a discrete tax benefit of
$72.8 million which was largely attributed to the release
of the Companys valuation allowances and the recording of
the associated net deferred tax assets on its balance sheet. The
Company continues to maintain $0.2 million valuation
allowance against a portion of its foreign net operating loss
deferred tax assets.
Income tax contingencies are accounted for and may require
significant management judgment in estimating final outcomes.
Actual results could differ materially from these estimates and
could significantly affect the effective tax rate and cash flows
in future years. As of July 31, 2011, the Company had
$10.9 million of unrecognized tax benefits, and if
recognized will have an effect on the Companys effective
tax rate.
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) consists of other comprehensive
income (loss) and net income (loss). Other comprehensive income
(loss) consists of unrealized investment gains and losses from
available-for-sale
securities. No other-than temporary impairment has been recorded
by the Company during fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU)
No. 2011-04,
Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and
Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International
Financial Reporting Standards (Topic
820) Fair Value Measurement (ASU
2011-04),
to provide a consistent definition of fair value and ensure that
the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are
similar between U.S. GAAP and International Financial
Reporting Standards. ASU
2011-04
changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances
the disclosure requirements particularly for level 3 fair
value measurements (as defined in Note 2 below). ASU
2011-04 is
effective for the Company for the third quarter of fiscal 2012
and will be applied prospectively. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of its pending adoption of ASU
2011-04 on
its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2011-05,
Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)
Presentation of Comprehensive Income (ASU
2011-05),
to require an entity to present the total of comprehensive
income, the components of net income, and the components of
other comprehensive income either in a single continuous
statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but
consecutive statements. ASU
2011-05
eliminates the option to present the components of other
comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity. ASU
2011-05 is
68
ARUBA
NETWORKS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
effective for the Company in for the third quarter of fiscal
2012 and will be applied retrospectively. The Companys
adoption of ASU
2011-05 will
not have an impact on its consolidated results of operations or
financial condition.
On September 2, 2010, the Company completed its acquisition
of Azalea Networks (Azalea) for a total purchase
price of $42.0 million. Azalea is a leading supplier of
outdoor mesh networks and includes an operations center in
Beijing, China which will complement the Companys existing
research and development centers. The results of Azaleas
operations have been included in the Consolidated Financial
Statements since the acquisition date. The tangible and
intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded
at fair value on the acquisition date.
The purchase price consisted of the following (in thousands,
except share and per share data):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock (1,524,517 shares at $18.82 per share)
|
|
$
|
28,691
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
Contingent rights
|
|
|
9,486
|
|
|
Advance on purchase price
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration
|
|
$
|
41,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on managements estimates of
their fair values on the acquisition date. The excess of the
purchase consideration over the fair value of the net assets
acquired was allocated to goodwill. Goodwill is not being
amortized but reviewed annually for impairment, or more
frequently if impairment indicators arise. In part, goodwill
reflected the competitive advantages the Company expected to
realize from Azaleas standing in the China service
provider industry as well as Azaleas product
differentiation.
The following table summarizes the estimated purchase price
allocation (in thousands, except estimated useful lives).
Estimates of liabilities are subject to change, pending the
Companys final review of Azaleas obligations.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
550
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
2,525
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
1,794
|
|
|
Prepaids and other assets
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tangible assets acquired
|
|
|
5,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
ARUBA
NETWORKS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful Lives
|
|
|
|
Amortizable intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Existing technology
|
|
|
11,800
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
Patents/core technology
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
6 years
|
|
Customer contracts
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
6 years
|
|
Tradenames/trademarks
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
2 years
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
24,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
47,307
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
(5,322
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(5,322
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
41,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purchased intangible assets have a weighted average useful
life of 5.2 years from the date of the acquisition.
A portion of the purchase price was allocated to developed
product technology and in-process research and development
(IPR&D). They were identified and valued
through an analysis of data provided by Azalea concerning
developmental products, their stage of development, the time and
resources needed to complete them, target markets, their
expected income generating ability and associated risks. The
Income Approach, which is based on the premise that the value of
an asset is the present value of its future earning capacity,
was the primary valuation technique employed. A discount rate of
16% was applied to developed product technology and IPR&D.
The Company recognizes IPR&D at fair value as of the
acquisition date, and subsequently accounts for it as an
indefinite-lived intangible asset until completion or
abandonment of the associated research and development efforts.
IPR&D is tested for impairment during the period it is
considered an indefinite-lived asset.
Developed product technology, which includes products that are
already technologically feasible, is primarily comprised of a
portfolio of outdoor mesh routers. Developmental projects that
had not reached technological feasibility are recognized as
identifiable intangible assets. The principal project at the
acquisition date relates to developing multi-radio outdoor mesh
routers for the core network for even the largest enterprises.
This technology would enable faster internet access for higher
throughput performance, covering greater distances for both mesh
and video networks. The Company expects to incur an immaterial
amount of post-acquisition costs during fiscal 2012. The Company
expects to complete all work by the end of fiscal 2012.
The Company expensed $0.7 million of acquisition-related
costs incurred as general and administrative expenses in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations in the period the expense
was incurred.
Based on its evaluation of the materiality of Azaleas
stand-alone financial statements to the Consolidated Financial
Statements of Aruba Networks taken as a whole, the Company
determined that the acquisition does not meet the requirements
needed to disclose pro forma financial statements for the
acquisition.
On November 19, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement
with Amigopod, pursuant to which Aruba acquired substantially
all of the assets of Amigopod. The acquisition was completed on
December 3, 2010. The total consideration was
$3.0 million and resulted in additional goodwill of
$0.6 million.
70
ARUBA
NETWORKS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Contingent
Rights Liability
Contingent rights were issued to each Azalea shareholder as part
of the purchase consideration. For each share received, the
Azalea shareholder also received a right to receive an amount of
cash equal to the shortfall generated if a share is sold below
the target value within the payment period, as specified in the
arrangement. For shares not held in escrow, the payment period
begins August 1, 2011 and ends on December 31, 2011.
For shares held in escrow, the payment period begins
April 2, 2012 and ends on May 1, 2012. The rights are
subject to forfeiture in certain circumstances.
At the acquisition date, the Company recorded a liability for
the estimated fair value of the contingent rights of
$9.5 million. This liability was estimated using a lattice
model and was based on significant inputs not observed in the
market and thus represented a Level 3 instrument.
Level 3 instruments are valued based on unobservable inputs
that are supported by little or no market activity and reflect
the Companys own assumptions in measuring fair value. The
inputs included:
|
|
|
| |
|
stock price as of the valuation date;
|
| |
| |
|
strike price of the contingent right;
|
| |
| |
|
maximum payoff per share;
|
| |
| |
|
number of shares held in and outside of escrow;
|
| |
| |
|
exercise period;
|
| |
| |
|
historical volatility of the Companys stock price based on
weekly stock price returns; and
|
| |
| |
|
risk-free rate interpolated from the Constant Maturity Treasury
Rate.
|
The change in fair value from the acquisition date to
July 31, 2011 was primarily driven by an increase in the
Companys stock price and the approaching settlement date.
Gains and losses on the remeasurement of the contingent rights
liability are included in other income (expense), net. As the
fair value of the contingent rights liability will largely be
determined based on the Companys closing stock price as of
future fiscal period-ends, it is not possible to determine a
probable range of possible outcomes of the valuation of the
contingent rights liability. However, the maximum contingent
rights liability will be no more than $13.5 million as
defined in the acquisition agreement.
The following table represents the change in the contingent
rights liability:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Acquisition date fair value measurement
|
|
|
9,486
|
|
|
Adjustments to fair value
|
|
|
(3,598
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
5,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
ARUBA
NETWORKS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
3.
|
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
|
The following table presents details of the Companys
goodwill:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
7,656
|
|
|
Goodwill acquired in acquisition
|
|
|
25,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of April 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
33,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents details of the Companys total
purchased intangible assets:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
Useful Lives
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except estimated useful lives)
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Existing technology
|
|
4 to 5 years
|
|
$
|
22,383
|
|
|
$
|
(10,595
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,788
|
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
NA
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
Patents/core technology
|
|
4 to 6 years
|
|
|
6,026
|
|
|
|
(3,110
|
)
|
|
|
2,916
|
|
|
Customer contracts
|
|
6 to 7 years
|
|
|
6,933
|
|
|
|
(3,137
|
)
|
|
|
3,796
|
|
|
Support agreements
|
|
5 to 6 years
|
|
|
2,917
|
|
|
|
(1,849
|
)
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
|
Tradenames/trademarks
|
|
1 to 5 years
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
(529
|
)
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
2 years
|
|
|
812
|
|
|
|
(758
|
)
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,841
|
|
|
$
|
(19,978
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
Useful Lives
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except estimated useful lives)
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Existing technology
|
|
4 years
|
|
$
|
9,283
|
|
|
$
|
(5,914
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,369
|
|
|
Patents/core technology
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
3,046
|
|
|
|
(1,940
|
)
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
Customer contracts
|
|
6 to 7 years
|
|
|
5,083
|
|
|
|
(2,020
|
)
|
|
|
3,063
|
|
|
Support agreements
|
|
5 to 6 years
|
|
|
2,717
|
|
|
|
(1,284
|
)
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
Tradenames/trademarks
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
(284
|
)
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
2 years
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
(712
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,441
|
|
|
$
|
(12,154
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense is recorded in the Consolidated Statements
of Operations under the following:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenues
|
|
$
|
5,852
|
|
|
$
|
3,082
|
|
|
$
|
3,082
|
|
|
Cost of professional services and support revenues
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
1,432
|
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
1,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization expense
|
|
$
|
7,824
|
|
|
$
|
4,804
|
|
|
$
|
4,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
ARUBA
NETWORKS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The estimated future amortization expense of purchased
intangible assets as of July 31, 2011 is as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Years ending July 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
6,519
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
4,791
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
4,083
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
3,310
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
19,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Net
Income (Loss) Per Common Share
|
Basic net income (loss) per common share is calculated by
dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income
(loss) per common share is calculated by giving effect to all
potentially dilutive common shares, including stock options and
awards, unless the result is anti-dilutive. The following tables
set forth the computation of net income (loss) per share:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
70,688
|
|
|
$
|
(33,998
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,413
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
100,299
|
|
|
|
89,978
|
|
|
|
84,612
|
|
|
Dilutive effect of employee stock plans
|
|
|
16,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
117,117
|
|
|
|
89,978
|
|
|
|
84,612
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share basic
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share diluted
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following outstanding options and restricted stock awards
were excluded from the computation of diluted net income (loss)
per common share for the periods presented because including
them would have had an anti-dilutive effect
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase common stock
|
|
|
1,279
|
|
|
|
4,072
|
|
|
|
8,212
|
|
|
Restricted stock awards
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
860
|
|
73
ARUBA
NETWORKS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
5.
|
Short-Term
Investments
|
Short-term investments consist of the following:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
Basis
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds and notes
|
|
$
|
41,912
|
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
42,020
|
|
|
U.S. government agency securities
|
|
|
40,824
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
40,850
|
|
|
U.S. treasury bills
|
|
|
57,026
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
57,093
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
5,590
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,592
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
7,618
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments
|
|
$
|
152,970
|
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
|
$
|
(22
|
)
|
|
$
|
153,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
Basis
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds and notes
|
|
$
|
23,802
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,867
|
|
|
U.S. government agency securities
|
|
|
80,683
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
80,752
|
|
|
U.S. treasury bills
|
|
|
12,816
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,873
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
4,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,495
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
2,179
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments
|
|
$
|
123,975
|
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
124,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cost basis and fair value of debt securities by contractual
maturity are presented below:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
Basis
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year or less
|
|
$
|
60,255
|
|
|
$
|
60,358
|
|
|
One to two years
|
|
|
92,715
|
|
|
|
92,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments
|
|
$
|
152,970
|
|
|
$
|
153,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
Basis
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year or less
|
|
$
|
93,597
|
|
|
$
|
93,700
|
|
|
One to two years
|
|
|
30,378
|
|
|
|
30,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments
|
|
$
|
123,975
|
|
|
$
|
124,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company reviews the individual securities in its portfolio
to determine whether a decline in a securitys fair value
below the amortized cost basis is other than temporary. The
Company determined that there were no
74
ARUBA
NETWORKS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
investments in its portfolio, related to credit losses or
otherwise, that were other-than temporarily impaired during
fiscal 2011, 2010 or 2009.
The following table summarizes the fair value and gross
unrealized losses of the Companys investments with
unrealized losses aggregated by type of investment instrument
and length of time that individual securities have been in a
continuous unrealized loss position:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds and notes
|
|
$
|
6,264
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
U.S. government agency securities
|
|
|
11,576
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
U.S. treasury bill
|
|
|
10,029
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27,869
|
|
|
$
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds and notes
|
|
$
|
7,400
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
U.S. government agency securities
|
|
|
15,245
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,645
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no short-term investments in a continuous unrealized
loss position for more than 12 months as of July 31,
2011 and 2010.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of bank deposits
with third-party financial institutions and highly liquid money
market securities with original maturities at date of purchase
of 90 days or less and are stated at cost which
approximates fair value.
Short-term investments are recorded at fair value, defined as
the exit price in the principal market in which the Company
would transact representing the amount that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants. Level 1
instruments are valued based on quoted market prices in active
markets for identical instruments and include the Companys
investments in money market funds. Level 2 securities are
valued using quoted market prices for similar instruments,
nonbinding market prices that are corroborated by observable
market data, or discounted cash flow techniques and include the
Companys investments in corporate bonds and notes,
U.S. government agency securities, U.S. treasury
bills, and commercial paper. Level 3 instruments are valued
based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no
market activity and reflect the Companys own assumptions
in measuring fair value. The Company has no short-term
investments classified as Level 3 instruments. There were
no transfers between different levels during fiscal 2011.
75
ARUBA
NETWORKS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair value measurements of the Companys cash, cash
equivalents and short-term investments consisted of the
following: